...defendant. Brady v. Maryland soys that all material "favorable to an accused . . . where the evidence ia material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." oust be supplied to defendant and_hia counsel: Thus, • worthy prosecutorial motive in secreting tapes...

...(1963), and hence must be preserved. In Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...or bad faith of the prosecution." (373 US at 87.) We have previously held that the formal memoranda of interviews conducted by IRS agents of taxpayers...

...materiality requirement more than borne out. Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83 (1963), held "that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution." Id., at 87. This materiality requirement was emphasized in Moore v. Illinois, 408 US 786 (1972), where...

...the defendant's attorney requested disclosure of the information. We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution. Id. at 87. The Supreme Court has also indicated that the refusal to disclose a defendant's statements...

...was extended in Brady v. Maryland, where the United States Supreme Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...faith of the prosecution." 373 US at 87, 83 S. Ct. at 1196-97, 10 U. Ed. 2d at 218. One of the key issues that often arises in grady- type-cases is 1675f...

...promise that "silence will carry no penalty."68 Similarly, we have concluded that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment. " M We have also concluded that vindictive prosecution violates due process;60 so too does vindictive...

...was extended in Brady v. Maryland, where the United States Supreme Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused...punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad filth of the prosecution." 377 US at 87, 83 S. Ct. at 1196-97, 10 U. Cd. 2d at 218. One of the kev...

...(1963). the Supreme Court held that "the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to the accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment." 373 US at 87. 83 S.Ct. at 1196. When the credibility of a [prosecution] witness is a criticai...

...JUfylanfl. 373 US 83, 67 (1*63), held that "the auppreaalon by tne proaecution of evidence favorable co an accused upon request violates due process where...irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the proaecution." (Btphaaia added). see alao united States v. Aoura. 427 0.8. 97, 110 n.17 (1976). Thus...

...Supreme Court held in the case of Brady v. Maryland, 373 US 83 (1962), "We now hold that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due processs where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good...