...court of competent jurisdiction in which a judgment or decree is rendered upon the merits, cannot he disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and the rulo is the same whether the second suit is for the same or for a different cause of action. Southern...

...court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1, 48 [18 S. Ct. 18, 27, 42 L. Ed. 355], 'that a right, question or fact distinctly put in...between the same parties or their privies.' " And then it was said : "Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization,...

...Pac. 105G. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined by a court or competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. — Lyons v. Empire Fuel Co.. MSCCA, 262...

...States, supra, the Supreme Court said : The general principle announced in numerous cases is that n right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and...competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot he disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies : and even if the second...

...determine the effect of the judgment so far as the city is concerned. Under the rule of res ju<licata, a right, question or fact, distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the...

...was stated as follows : "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right,question, or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground for recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, or their privies ;...

...the subject of res judicata are reviewed by Mr. Justice Harlan, and the general doctrine thus stated: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or fheir privies : and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question,...

...estoppel is stated by Mr. Justice Harlan in Southern Pacific Railroad v. US, 168 US 1, as follows : "The general principle announced in numerous cases...the same parties or their privies; and even if the necond suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once so determined must,...

...doctrine of res judicata or estoppel by judgment is that both parties have had their day in court, and that a right, question, or fact, distinctly put in...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies. Johannessen v. United States, 225 US 227, 56 L. ed. 1066. In the case now before us it is true that...

...of which, together with the court's findings, is attached to the stipulation hereinbefore described. A right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot be disputed but must be taken as conclusively established in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if...