Obrazy na stronie
PDF
ePub
[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

£. s. d Difficulties experienced with the foundations delayed completion Total Estimate ... - - - - - 58,000 – – and prevented the superstructure being commenced till the Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 7,967 13 8 close of the year. The sum of 250l. was paid to the original --contractor for the foundations under the award of an arbitrator Balance - - - £. 50,032 6 4 as compensation for terminating the Contract. l

£. s. d. Total Estimate - - - - - 5,550 – — Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 5,222 1 1

Remanet - - - - - - - - - - - pe \ Balance - - - £. 327 18 11 A difference arose with the Contractor which delayed the final £. s. d. payment under the Contract until after the close of the year. J Total Estimate, ; - - - - 5,500 - The expenditure includes a * of 2851. to an adjoining Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 5,183 l l 5 owner in full discharge of all claims for damage sustained by --his property by reason of the building operations. Balance - - - £. 316 8 7 The proportion of the total expenditure falling on 1904-5 was s £ s. d. heavier than had been expected when this Estimate was framed, J Total Estimate ... - - - - - 1,540 – — the result being a saving on the current year. The total cost of Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 1,480 l 4 the work proved lower than the forecast. l -Balance - - - £. 59 - 18 8 It was expected that substantial progress would have been made - £. s. d. before the close of the previous year, but work could not be so Estimate - - - - - 1,680 – – begun as early as had been hoped for, with the result that ( Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 1,550 13 6 practically the whole cost falls upon 1905-6. \ Balance - - - £. 129 6 6

- £. s. d

The work could not be commenced as early as anticipated owing [Total Estimate . . . - - - - 5,450 – — to delay in settling questions with the Local Authorities as to | Expenditure to 31st March 1900 - - 740 5 9 setting back the building from the street. -Balance - - - £. 4,709 14 3 - £. s. d. Total Estimate - - - - - 23,400 – – Casual variation - - - - - - - - - - (Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 17,437 6 — l Balance - - - £, 5,962 14 A dispute as to rights of light led to delay in the work towards - f. s. d. the close of 1904–5, and expenditure, which in the ordinary (Total Estimate - - - - - 5,200 — — course would have fallen on that year, has consequently become J Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 5,438 – 9 a charge on 1905-6. \ --Excess - - - £. 238 – 9 £. s. d. Total Estimate - - - - - 11, 150 – – Casual variation - - - - - - - - - - so to 31st March 1906 - - 10,900 12 ll \ Balance - - - £. 249 1 £ s. d. Total Estimate - - - - 11,400 – – Progress was in excess of anticipation - - - - - - J Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 8,216 11 11 Balance - - - £. 3, 183 8 1 £ s. d. Total Estimate - - - - - 1,850 – – The cost was somewhat over-estimated - - - - - |É.i. to 31st March 1906 - - * 1,387 16 5 Balance - - - £. 162 3 7

t * An amount of 14s. 1d. for excess fees received by the Quantity Surveyor has been refunded and carried to Appropria. ion in Aid.

CLAss I.-continued. VOTE 8–REVENUE BUILDINGS.—continued. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE FOR NEW WORKS continued. Vote. E BALANCE. - t - xPENDISection. DESCRIPTION. Tel Tune. Post. gr*i. Total. Unexpended. Excess. £ £ f £ s. d. £ s. d. £ s. d. Post AND TELEGRAPH BUILDINGs—cont. KI. WoRKS IN PROGREss—continued. Country, England and Wales—cont. 39 Liverpool, Old Swan : New Sorting 250 - 250 124 – 5 125 19 7 || - ce 40 lo, Seafooth : New Sorting 200 - 200 57 11 4 142 8 8 || – re 32/04–5 Maidstone Post Office: Extension - - - - 49 8 4 || – - 49 8 4 41 Manchester, Quay Street: Engineers’ - 10,500 10,500 9,134 9 3 || 1,365 10 9 || – - Stores 42 Merthyr Tydfil : New Post Office - 2,070 1,330 4,000 2,821 7 4 1,178 12 8 || – 43 Micheldever Post Office: Alterations - 300 100 400 222 10 8 177 9 4 || – - | 44 Middlesbrough: New Post office - 650 350 | 1,000 || 514 – 11 || 485 19 1 || - 13/03–4 Norwich Head Post Office : Enlarge. - - - 1 3 2 || – - I 3 2 Illent, | * 37/04–5 Oxford Post Office: Extension - - - 124 10 5 || – - 124 10 5 45 Peterborough Post Office: Extension. 650 350 | 1,000 2,113 10 9 || – – 1,113 10 9 CLASS I.-continued. Vote 8–REVENUE BUILDINGS.—continued. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE FOR NEW WORKS.— continued. O B S E R V AT I O N S. £. s. d. Total Estimate - - - - - 1,600 – — Savings were effected during the progress of the work . . J Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - . 1,529 8 3 Balance - - - £, 70 11 9 Total Estimat £. s. d The proportion of the total cost falling upon this year was less o stimate ...- ...t, - - 1,550 – — than had leen anticipated when this provision was made, and Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - - 1,497 4 4 there is a slight saving on the total Estimate. Balance - - - £ 52 15 8 - £ s. d s. Estimate - - - - 6,060 – — Realanet - - - - - - - - - - ... I Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - 5,636 3 3 l Balance - £. 423 16 9 - £. s. d. Total Estimate - - - - 21,000 — — | Progress was slower than had been anticipated when the Esti- Expenditure to 31st March 1906 - 17,356 l 6 mate was framed. Balance - £. 3,643 18 6

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The cost of the alterations proved lower than the forecast - J Expenditure to 31st March 1906

Balance

(Total Estimate

The progress of the work enabled payments to be made towards | Expenditure to 31st March 1906 the close of 1904–5 which it was not anticipated would have become due till the year now under notice and in which pro

| Balance vision was accordingly made. \

Total Estimate - - Remanet . . . . . . . . . . . / Expenditure to 31st March 1906

Excess

Total Estimate - - -
The contractor's account for fittings was not rendered until after / Expenditure to 31st March 1906 -
the close of 1904-5.
Excess -

| Total Estimate

The proportion of the total cost falling upon this year was Expenditure to 31st March 1906

treater than had been anticipated when the Estimate was |

ramed, owing to unforeseen delay in 1904-5. Balance -

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

CLASS I.-continued.

w

WOTE 8.—REVENUE BUILDINGS-continued.

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE FOR NEW WORKS-continued.

Vote. BALANCE. Section. DESCRIPTION. - For Post. 4. Total. Unexpended. Excess. POST AND TELEGRAPH BUILDINGs—cont. £. £. £. £ s. d £ s. d £ s. d K. I WORKS IN PROGREss—continued. Country, England and Wales—cont. 15/03–4 || Plymouth Head Post Office : Enlarge- - - - 17 12 10 || – - 17 12 10 ment 46 Portsmouth Post Office : Extension 330 170 500 1,069 3 5 || – - 569 3 5 47 | Richmond (Surrey) Post Office : En. 3,000 1,000 4,000 || 3,194 4 4 || 805 15 8 || – largement. 48 Rotherham : New Post Office - - 3,750 1,250 5,000 3,019 9 – 1,980 11 - || – * | Southampton: New Head Telegraph 30 470 500 901 14 2 || – – 401 14 2 and Branch Office. 50 | Shorncliffe Camp : New Post Office - | 1,280 320 1,600 1,419 15 5 180 4 7 || – 41/04-5 | Thornton Heath: New Sorting Office - - - 406 6 5 || – - 406 6 5 51 Weymouth: New Post Office - - || 3,750 1,250 5,000 3,587 13 11 1,412 6 1 52 Wigan Post Office : Extension - 170 30 200 93 12 9 106 7 3 || - 58 Wisbech Post Office : Extension - 1,000 330 1,330 1,590 – 10 || – - 260 - 10

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Remanet - - - - - - - - -
Excess -

Total Estimate -

The completion of the work was delayed with the result that -
Expenditure to 31st March 1906

expenditure, which it was thought would, have fallen upon the previous year, became chargeable to the one now under

notice. Balance

Total Estimate -

The expenditure to 31st March 1905 proved greater than had -
- Expenditure to 31st March 1906

been expected, the charge falling on this year being correspondingly reduced. There is also a slight saving on the total Estimate.

[ocr errors]

Balance

Total Estimate - - -
Expenditure to 31st March 1906

Delay was caused by the failure of the contractors
Balance -

Total Estimate -

Expenditure which was expected to have become chargeable -
Expenditure to 31st March 1906

to the year 1904–5 did not come in course of payment till after the close of that year owing to delay in the final stage of the work.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Excess

Total Estimate -

The proportion of the total cost falling upon the previous year Expenditure to 31st March 1906

proved greater than had been expected when this Estimate

was framed. Excess

Total Estimate - -
Expenditure to 31st March 1906

Balance

It was anticipated when this Estimate was framed that the final payment under the contract would have been made before the close of the year 1904-5. Questions arose, however, with the builders, which delayed the settlement till this year.

Total Estimate

Progress was hindered through difficulties caused by water Expenditure to 31st March 1906

being met with during the excavations for the foundations,

and by delays in obtaining materials. Balance

Total Estimate - - The charge on the year was over-estimated ; the tender for the J Expenditure to 31st March 1906

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
« PoprzedniaDalej »