Obrazy na stronie
PDF
ePub

of wrestling through rings than Will was, although the latter was always considered a more pains-taking Wrestler. Many of Richardson's friends assert, and among them are some well qualified to judge, that he was the fairest stander, and best Wrestler, of his time; while those rather hostile to him, contend, that he was a sulky (which is tantamount to an unfair) stander, and was as much indebted to that, and his tremendous strength of arm, as to his science. For our part, we have no reason to applaud or condemn;-we do not think any of our readers will deem us incapable of forming an opinion, and we assure them it is a free and unprejudiced one. We have not the least doubt but that he was for a number, or even for one fall, a competent match for any man in the kingdom for very many years. For us to endeavour to particularize his conquests would be absurd; and we have noticed his occasional defeats for the purpose of reflecting lustre on those who threw such a hero, and not by any means to detract from the great and well-merited renown he universally possessed."

We now bring this long, but, thanks to Mr Litt, this interesting article, to a close, with his account of the Carlisle wrestling in 1822.

"The first prize was won by W. Cass, and the second by John Weightman. As those who wrestled may yet be considered in possession of the ring, that circumstance must of course circumscribe our account of them. Cass is not far from six feet high, and weighs sixteen stones. The action he displays is an outside stroke with his left foot, but its fatality consists in the swing, or twist, with which it is accompanied, and his method of parting with his men. He was not much noticed previous to his throwing Weightman; but in our opinion he will, and is the only man who ought to throw him again. Cass is equally as strong, full as heavy, and Weightman will find it difficult to improve his hold, and command him as he does all his other opponents. Cass certainly won very cleverly, and though we must admit he wrestled fortunately through the ring, we think him the likeliest person to win again.-The redoubted Weightman is above six feet three inches high, and weighs upwards of fifteen stones. Weightman has certainly a very good-natured, and indeed we might with truth say, a prepossessing appearance. The whole science he appears master of is the address he displays in the application of his tremendous strength in breaking his adversary's, and improving his own hold. He appears to be master

of Liddle, and in the match between him and Richardson, the latter certainly had no chance with him. Respecting his behaviour towards the spectators on that occasion, we will remark that there is a very material difference between wrestling a private match, and contending for a public prize. The latter is expressly for the amusement of the spectators, and they have a right, as in a theatre, to express, in a certain degree, their opinion of the conduct of the performers; but with the former they have no right whatever, excepting to preserve fair play between the men; and when it is well known that this was neither the second nor third instance in which matches with Richardson never were decided, we have room to infer that the fault in taking hold might not be all Weightman's. The grand question now is-Is there one man in the present list who can throw him amain? Our opinion is, if there be one, there are not two. John Liddle, the victor at Keswick, and from whom much was anticipated at Carlisle, is upwards of fourteen stones, and about five feet ten inches high. It is scarcely fair to make lengthy remarks upon those who may again appear in the ring, therefore we shall only observe, that, with one exception, there is no wrestler of, or under his own weight at present, that can throw him. Graham had for some time been labouring under a bad state of health, and in appearance, as well as powers, had evidently declined. We likewise think that T. Richardson cannot be what he has been. As a hipper, he is certainly the quickest and best on the list. He is taller, but not so heavy as Liddle; and though we do not think him a T. Nicholson, yet very few at present are an equal match for him. John Fearon, who threw Weightman at Carlisle, is about the same height, but heavier than that hero. The fame of Weightman was his principal inducement for entering that ring, and by throwing him he accomplished his object. Respecting the contest between them, it was a bad one, and Weightman lost the fall at a time when he ought to have been certain of winning it. John Laughlen, the fourth stander on that occasion, is near six feet six inches high, and at present weighs about seventeen stones. Had he been in practice, and taken more pains in procuring an equal hold, Weightman ought not to have thrown him; as, though not excelling in action, he is by no means deficient in science. Having been some years married previous to his present settlement in Whitehaven as a publican, his practice must have been latterly very con

James

17

fined, otherwise he ought, and we think, would have been the present champion. -Weight and age considered, no Wrestler more distinguished himself at Carlisle than Robert Waters, the third stander. He appeared a little one, is a very young one, and gave most convincing proofs of his science and quickness-the two great essentials which constitute a finished Wrestler.-T. Todd, the last loser, is full five feet ten inches high, and weighs twelve stones and four pounds. Putting hearsay out of the question, and giving our opinion of what we have personally witnessed, Todd is the best and most finished Wrestler we ever saw. He has not the power of Nicholson, but excepting him, we never'saw a thirteen, nor is there at present any fourteen stone man, in our opinion, able to throw him the best of three, or five falls.-The prize given for Lads afforded much amusement, and many of them displayed infinite science, and seemed quite at home, in the ring. The two last, though not the tallest, or heaviest, among the competitors, were both, we were told, above the age specified in the advertisement."

The wrestling at the meeting 1823 is just over; and the prize was won by Weightman, who is now believed to be the most powerful wrestler in the world, and could be backed for five, eight, or eleven falls, against the human race.

In conclusion, we thank Mr Litt for his well-written, candid, manly, and scientific "Wrestliana." Should he ever come to Edinburgh, most happy shall we be to meet him at Ambrose's. Neither of us are so young as we were ten or fifteen years ago; yet we should like to see the man who would shove the one or the other of us off the "crown o' the causeway;" and surely no stronger argument in favour of athletic exercises in general is required, than the sound, stout, hale, ruddy appearance which we both exhibit, being most beautiful and perfect specimens of that perfection of human nature so concisely expressed by the poet,

"MENS SANA IN CORPORE SANO.".

NOTICES OF THE MODERN BRITISH DRAMATISTS.
No. II-Beddoes.*

THIS is precisely one of those compositions that a cold, clear, shrewd, and sarcastic critic would delight in clutching into his merciless grasp, to tear it into pieces and strew the floor of his study with its shivering fragments. Had it appeared during the blood-thirsty youth of the Edinburgh Review, a much more cruel murder would have been perpetrated upon its body than that which causes its own catastrophe,and all hands would have been held up in wonder and scorn of young Mr Thomas Lovel Beddoes. He would have gone moping about for years in disconsolate solitude, silent and sullen as a ghost, or would have rent the air with unavailing shrieks and lamenta tions. But he has been born during a happier era-the mild and benignant spirit of Christopher North has o

come the truculent spirit of Francis Jeffrey-that "old man eloquent" gathers all the youths of genius under his wing, protects them from every cutting blast, and bids them all go abasking in the sunshine of public favour, like so many partridges on a bank adjusting their fair plumage

without fear of the fowler. Young men, now-a-days, are not only permitted to write like young men, but praised and encouraged while doing so; and the whole world regards them with smiles of complacency and kindness, when they are seen to enjoy the favour of one benevolent Greybeard, who will not suffer his rising progeny to be maltreated by the vain or the vènal critic-crew.

a

The Brides' Tragedy is the work of Minor-and, although no doubt there have been many instances of Minors writing better than they ever did after they became Majors, nevertheless we admit the plea of nonage—an old head has no business on old shoulders; and an extremely wise, rational, sober, pretty-behaved and judicious springald, is not, to our taste, a commendable specimen of human nature. Now, Mr Beddoes is very far indeed from being a boy-wiseacre. He is often as silly as may be,-trifling to a degree that is "quite refreshing,"-as childish as his best friends could desire to see him in a summer's day,-fantastic and capricious as any Miss-in-her-teens,-and

The Brides' Tragedy. By Thomas Lovell Beddoes. London, F. C. and J. Rivington, 1822. VOL. XIV.

4 Y

pathetic to an excess that absolutely merits the strappado. Why not? all so much the better. He is a fine, open-hearted, ingenuous, accomplished and gentlemanly youth; and we, whose prophecies have been fulfilled somewhat more frequently than those of the Editor of the Blue-and-Yellow, pronounce him a promising poet, we tie a wreath of laurel round his forehead, and may it remain there till displaced to make room for a bolder branch of the sacred Tree.

The subject of the Drama is a good one, deeply, terribly tragic-" a tale of tears, a rueful story,"-a murder strange and overwhelming to the imagination, yet such a murder as the mind can image and believe in its wild and haunted moods. Mr Beddoes deserves praise for choosing such a subject --for all true Tragedy must possess its strength in a spirit of terror. His reading seems to have lain among the elder Dramatists, and his mind is much imbued with their tragic character. We sup full of horrors, but there are some gay and fantastic garnishings and adornments of the repast, disposed quite in the manner and spirit of those great old masters. Joy and sorrow, peace and despair, innocence and guilt, saintliness and sin, sit all together at one banquet; and we scarcely distinguish the guests from each other, till something interrupts the flow of the feast, and they start up in their proper character. Yes, there is a dark and troubled, guilt-like and death-like gloom flung over this first work of a truly poetical mind, sometimes alternating with an air of ethereal tenderness and beauty, sometimes slowly and in a ghastly guise encroaching upon and stifling it, and sometimes breaking up and departing from it, in black masses, like clouds from a lovely valley on a tempestuous and uncertain day. Dip into the Poem, here and there, and you cannot tell what it is about-you see dim imagery, and indistinct figures, and fear that the author has written a very so so perform ance. But give it a reading from the beginning, and you will give it a reading to the end, for our young poet writes in the power of nature, and when at any time you get wearied or disappointed with his failure in passion or in plot, you are pleased-nay, delighted, with the luxuriance of his fancy, and with a strain of imaginative feeling that supplies the place of a profounder interest, and also prepares the mind to give way to that pro

found interest, when, by and by, it unexpectedly and strongly arrives.

"The following scenes were written, as you well know, exclusively for the closet, founded upon facts which occurred at Oxford, and are well detailed and illustrated by an interesting ballad in a little volume of Poems, lately published at Oxford, entitled the Midland Minstrel, by Mr Gillet: and may thus be succinctly narrated.

"The Manciple of one of the Colleges early in the last century had a very beautiful daughter, who was privately married to a student without the knowledge of the parents on either side.

"During the long vacation subsequent to this union the husband was introduced to a young lady, who was at the same time proposed as his bride; absence, the fear of his father's displeasure, the presence of a lovely object, and, most likely, a natural fickleness of disposition, overcame any regard he might have cherished for his illfated wife, and finally he became deeply enamoured of her unconscious rival. In the contest of duties and desires, which was the consequence of this passion, the worse part of man prevailed, and he formed and executed a design almost unparalleled in the annals of crime.

"His second nuptials were at hand when he returned to Oxford, and to her who was now an obstacle to his happiness. Late at night he prevailed upon his victim to accompany him to a lone spot in the Divinity Walk, and there murdered and buried her. The wretch escaped detection, and the horrid deed remained unknown till he confessed it on his death-bed. The remains of the unfortunate girl were dug up in the place described, and the Divinity Walk was deserted and demolished, as haunted ground. Such are the the outlines of a Minor's Tragedy."

There is nothing very imposing in the office of a manciple; and accordingly Mr Beddoes has left the peculiar character of his heroine's status in

society undefined. She and her parents are poor and humble, and live in a cottage that is all we know, and it is enough. The fair Floribel is the bride of Hesperus, a youth of high birth, and their marriage remains, for obvious reasons, concealed. The first scene

in which they appear at evening in the garden of the lowly cottage, and feast on love's delicious converse, is very pretty, although not very rational, and serves to interest us for the simple, beautiful, and affectionate Floribel.

"Come, come, my love, or shall I call
you bride ?
Floribel.

E'en what you will, so that
you hold me dear.
Hesperus. Well, both my love and
bride; see, here's a bower

Of Eglantine with honeysuckles woven, Where not a spark of prying light creeps in,

So closely do the sweets enfold each other. 'Tis Twilight's home; come in, my gentle love,

And talk to me. So! I've a rival here; What's this that sleeps so sweetly on your neck?

Flor. Jealous so soon, my Hesperus ?
Look then,

It is a bunch of flowers I pulled for
you;
Here's the blue violet, like Pandora's eye,
When first it darkened with immortal life.

Hes. Sweet as thy lips. Fie on those taper fingers,

Have they been brushing the long grass aside

To drag the daisy from it's hiding-place, Where it shuns light, the Danäe of flowers, With gold up-hoarded on its virgin lap? Flor. And here's a treasure that I found by chance,

A lily of the valley; low it lay

Over a mossy mound, withered and weeping

As on a fairy's grave."

After some soft talk and fond endearments, not unmixed with some natural tears, Floribel gives utterance to those thoughts" that in the happiness of love make the heart sink”—they part, and the short scene passes by like a dream.

Hesperus has a rival in the affections of Floribel," the Diana of our Forests," named Orlando, who throws old Lord Ernest, the father of Hesperus, into prison, on account of a debt, "of which his whole estate is scarce a fourth." This debt, however, is not to be claimed, provided Hesperus consent to wed Olivia, in which case Orlando hopes to espouse Floribel. This is a clumsy contrivance, but it cannot be helped. Accordingly Hesperus is admitted to his father, in chains and in a dungeon, when the following dialogue ensues.

"Lord Ernest. Oh set me free, I cannot

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Hesp. Bring the priest, the bride. Quick, quick. These fetters have infected

him

With slavery's sickness. Yet there is a

secret,

'Twixt heaven and me, brbids it. Tell me, father;

Were it not best for both to die at once? Lord Ern. Die! thou hast spoke a word,

that makes my heart

Grow sick and wither; thou hast palsied

me

To death. Live thou to wed some worthier maid;

[blocks in formation]

a cause;

Guards; (they enter) I am ready. Let me
say't so low,

So quickly that it may escape the ear
Of watchful angels; I will do it all.

Lord Ern. There's nought to do; I've learned to love this solitude. Farewell, my son. Nay, never heed the fetters,

We can make shift to embrace.

Hesp. Lead him to freedom, And tell your lord I will not, that's I will. (Exeunt Lord Ernest and guards.) Here, fellow; put your hand upon my mouth

Till they are out of hearing. Leave me

now.

No, stay; come near me, nearer yet. Now

fix

The close attention of your eyes on mine."

Soon after his father's liberation, Hesperus visits his Floribel in her cottage, but finds her rather coy and fretted by his too-long absence. During this lovers' quarrel, Orlando's boy gives a letter to Floribel, who reads it, and then dismisses him with a kiss. Hesperus either feels or feigns jealousy, and parts from his unhappy wife, with displeasure and anger. He is next introduced to Olivia, who proves to be a most engaging and delightful creature; and Hesperus, alas! transfers his affection to her, from his own Floribel. This scene is managed with considerable skill, and reminds one of something in Ford or Massinger. We see that the affection of the fickle, weak, and unprincipled Hesperus for Floribel, has given way under the fa

scination of a beautiful woman of his own rank, and that misery and death are about to knock at the door of that humble cottage.

"Floribel,

I would not have thee cross my path to night;

There is an indistinct dread purpose forming,

Something, whose depth of wickedness appears

Hideous, incalculable, but inevitable; Now it draws nearer, and I do not shudder;

Avaunt! haunt me no more; I dread it
not,

But almost-hence! I must not be alone."
In this unhallowed state of mind he
retires to rest, but finds none, and
starts up
from horror-haunted dreams.
"Hesperus discovered in a disturbed
slumber.

Hesperus, (starting from his couch.)
Who speaks? Who whispers there? A
light! a light!

I'll search the room, something hath called me thrice,

With a low muttering voice of toadish
hisses,

And thrice I slept again. But still it came
Nearer and nearer, plucked my mantle from

me,

And made mine heart an ear, in which it
poured

Its loathed enticing courtship. Ho! a light.
Enter Attendant with a torch.
Thou drowsy snail, thy footsteps are asleep,
Hold up the torch.

Attend. My lord, you are disturbed.
Have you seen aught?

Hesp. I lay upon my bed,
And something in the air, out-jetting night,
Converting feeling to intenser vision,
Featured its ghastly self upon my soul
Deeper than sight.

Attend. This is Delusion surely; She's busy with men's thoughts at all night hours,

And to the waking subtle apprehension
The darkling chamber's still and sleepy air
Hath breath and motion oft.

Hesp. Lift up the hangings, mark the

doors, the corners ; Seest nothing yet? No face of fiend-like mirth

More frightful than the fixed and doggish grin

Of a dead madman ?

Attend. Nought I see, my lord, Save the long, varied crowd of warlike shapes

Set in the stitched picture.

Hesp.
Heard ye then?
There was a sound, as though some mar-

ble tongue
Moved on its rusty hinge, syllabling harshly
The hoarse death-rattle into speech.

« PoprzedniaDalej »