« PoprzedniaDalej »
O rem ridiculam, Cato & jpcosam! Ridiculous only would such assertions be, if their inAuence stopped at the absurd manner of pronouncing a dead language; but since they directly tend to make ihe language of a great part of God's Revelation, and consequently this Revelation itself, ridiculous, they deserve a inuch severer name, Well then, let the llebrew have the same vowels as almost all other languages: but how, saith an objector, shall we pronounce Hebrew syllables;' and even words, (and many such there are) whereix none of the vowels above mentioned appear? I answer, with Dr. Robertson, supply in every such syllable a short towel, no matter which, for all vowels when pronounced short and quick are nearly the saine : Thus call 727, débér or dábár, po, perqués, or párjuâd, &c. And us you pronounce the supplied vowels short, so to distinguish them from the textuul vowels pronounce these latter always long. Thus nay you read and pronounce disa tintly the Hebrew Bible from the beginning to the end.
Iż is certain that the antient Hebrers, who, we have proved, had not the points, must have used soine such inethod of reading, and so probably did all the * oriental nations, till after the time of Mahomet.
Thus much for reading or prorouncing the IIebrew language without the vowel points. That it may also be construed and understood without their aid is indisputable because many actually do thus understand and are able to construe it. And that this method of learning Hebrew is, beyond all comparison, easier than the rabbinical on“, is no less certain. The Grammar of the Hebrew language without points, is of all others the most simple, easy, and concise. The grammatical distinctions are in the textual letters themselves. The various forms and deflections of nouns and verbs are in most cases absolutely determined by the letters of the word itself compared with the context. And I can assure your correspondent; änd am ready to prove it in any particular instance, that there: is not a single ambiguous expression in the Hebrete Bible,
For ncither the antient Arabic, Syriac, Chaldee, nor Persic, had any zowel points, and the Samuritun has none to this day. See Walton's. Proleg. III. $ 48. Vol. VIII. Churchm. Mag. April 1805. Mm
but the sense of it may be determined in a muchbetter and
MR. EVANSON to E. P.
10 TAE EDITOR OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCHMAN'S
last in the Number of this Magazine for January, I perfectly agree with you, that it is highly improbable we shall either of us convince the other, where that im
portant object religious truth is to be found, for which we both profess to entertain the greatest regard. I also think with you, that temperate, liberal discussions of this natúre," by contributing to elicit truth, may be serviceable to others.” And with a view to conduce, on my part, to so desirable an end, I beg once more of the Editor, to be indulged with the liberty of stating a few short observations upon the chief arguments you have urged.
Did the Athanasian creed consist of only two proposi', tions, it would certainly be inconsistent to call it both unintelligible and contradictory. But composed, as it is, of a long series of different propositions, it is surely very possible that some of them may be unintelligible, and others contradictory to each other; which appears to me to be actually the case.
In your paragraph on the subject of blasphemy, you are pleased to blame me for not making a distinction between the idolatry of heathens, and the idolatry of those who call themselves Christians, because the idolatry of the latter is not" paid to wood and stone, independently
reference to the true God.” But neither, Sir, was the idolatry of the former. There never yet existed a nation so utierly devoid of reason as to imagine the idols they themselves made, and before which they wore shipped, to be the powers who governed the world, and controlled the affairs of men; but merely visible representatives of that power, or those powers which they believed to reside in Heaven above them. Cælo tonantem credidimus Joven regnare, says Horace, not the image of Jupiter in the capitol. The author of the Epistle to the Romans indeed (not St Paul) “ charges the heathens, who, though they knew God, glorified him not as God, with changing the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image like to corruptible men, &c. But both you and I know, Sir, that the idolatry of the heathen was actually owing to their ignorance of the one only true God, and of those attributes by which alone inen can form any ra. tional idea of his nature. Accordingly the true St. Paul when he zealously endeavoured to convert the Athenians from idolatry to the worship of the true God, ascribed their idolatrous devotions solely to their not knowing the only proper object of them; and told them, that “the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now com grandeth all men every where to repent, &c." M m 2
You scem, Sir, to think, that the Church of Rome ig guilty of no other idolatry, 'than the invocation of the Saints to inicrcede for thein with the Deity. And since that very circunstance shews, that they do not pray to them as Gods; such invocation, however irrational and unjustifiable, is by no means the idolatry so accurately defined, and so strictly forbidden in the second conmandment of the Jewish Decalogue, nor consequently that blasphemous node of worship which is ascribed in the propliecies of Scripture to the predicted apostate Church. But when she worships before the figure of a mortal man, dying or dead upon the cross, as a just and proper representation of “ God who made the world and all things therein,” she then is guilty of " changing the glory of the corruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man." The obvious inferences I leave to the reflections of your own mind.
To discuss properly the nature of probable and demonstrative evidence, would require inore room tlian could be allowed in a publication of this kind. I therefore wave it for the present; observing only, that I readily acknowledge the profession of belief in the Christian re. ligion of different men to be made upon very different degrees of assurance; and by tlie generality without any satisfactory evidence at all. But I find my mental faculties" so courstituted, that nothing short of clear demonstration of its truit and divine authority, could ever have produced in my mind, that full conviction which, in my ëstimation, can alone 'be justly denominated rational belief. “That the sun will rise to-morrow morning," you tell us is only a probability, And so it is to the mere philosopher, who is unconvinecd of the existence of a God, or at least of the truth and certainty of any revelation of his will having proceeded from liim; but io him who perceives demonstrative evidence of both, and who is convinced that 'thie decrces of the omnipotent cannot fail of being accomplished; and who therefore with David regards the testiinonies of God as sure, nçost sure, Ps: 19, and 93, that the sun will rise to-inórrow is as certain, as that it has risen to day. Because the saine first cause of all things, by wliose will alone the sun began to shine, hath declared it to be his will, that the earth shall remain, if not for ever, at least long enough to experience many changes in the moral state of its inhabitants, which are still far distant; and also, that."
long as the earth remaineth, day and night, that is, the rising and setting of the sun shall not cease, Gen. viii. 22. Jer. xxxiii. 20 and 25.
As I consider it of great importance to ascertain the true date of the apocalypse, I referred to 1 Cor. xv. 52. is affording irrefragable proof in the words trumpet, last trumpet, and he shall sound the trumpet, that it must have been written before that epistle of Paul. But you avoid replying to my remarks upon them; and only speak in general terms of " many passages of the Old Testament, dic.” without specifying any one. So that it is not possible to judge whether there be any, or what degree of similarity between the case. Į bave stated, and any one of those to which you may allude.
It was no small surprise to me to find from your next paragraph, that when you undertook to review my Reflections, &c. you could have read it with so very little attention, as to think the explication I have there given of the predictions of the apocalypse, cannot be admitted as just and true, or rejected as erroneous and false, for fifty or sixty years to come. The certainty of the miraculous appearance of Jesus Christ to assume his promised kingdom, and to destroy the whole apostate church; the resurrection of the just; and the conversion of all the nations within the limits of Daniel's four monarchies to the true and rational religion of the new covenant of the Gospel; in consequence of the effects produced by so wonderful, supernatural a completion of these predictions of Daniel and John, can indeed be proved only by those events taking place at the period assig..ed by both those prophets; and which, according to their data, cannot now be more than about that number of years distant. But I have given explanations of the accomplishe ment of a long series of other predictions from the conmencement of the wars, of the Jews to the late extraor. dinary, insurrections and revolutions in so mnany of the European states, some in common with other commentators, others, as of the seven vials peculiar to myseli. And if they are erroneous, any man acquainted with the usual sense of figurative language, and with the history of Christendom within these eras, may, very, easily prove them to be, go, by comparing thein with the terins of the predictions, themselves, and with the corresponding his. torical occurrences to which I have referred them. But it upon such a comparison they are found to be accur