LETTER LXVI.

To the Revd. WILLIAM UNWIN.

MY DEAR FRIEND,

Sept. 17, 1780.

You desire my further thoughts on the subject of education. I send you such as had for the most part occurred to me, when I wrote last, but could not be comprised in a single Letter. They are indeed on a different branch of this interesting theme, but not less important than the former.

I think it your happiness, and wish you to think it so yourself, that you are, in every respect, qualified for the task of instructing your son, and preparing him for the university, without commiting him to the care of a stranger. In my judgment, a domestic education deserves the preference to a public one, on an hundred accounts, which I have neither time nor room to mention. I shall only touch upon two or three, that I cannot but consider as having a right to your most earnest attention.

In a public school, or indeed in any school, his morals are sure to be but little attended to, and his religion not all. If he can catch the love of vir

tue from the fine things, that are spoken of it in the classics, and the love of holiness from the customary atendance upon such preaching as he is likely to hear, it will be well; but I am sure you have had too many opportunities to observe the inefficacy of such means, to expect any such advantage from them. In the mean time, the more powerful influence of bad example, and perhaps bad company, will continually counterwork these only preservatives he can meet with, and may possibly send him home to you, at the end of five or six years, such as you will be sorry to see him. You escaped indeed the contagion yourself, but a few instances of happy exemption from a general malady, are not sufficient warrant to conclude, that it is therefore not infectious, or may be encountered without danger.

You have seen too much of the world, and are a man of too much reflection, not to have observed, that in proportion as the sons of a family approach to years of maturity, they lose a sense of obligation to their parents, and seem at last, almost, divested of that tender affection, which the nearest of all relations seems to demand from them. I have often observed it myself, and have always thought I

could sufficiently account for it, without laying all the blame upon the children. While they continue in their parents' house, they are every day obliged, and every day reminded how much it is their interest, as well as duty, to be obliging and affectionate in return. But at eight or nine years of age, the boy goes to school. From that moment he becomes a stranger in his father's house. The course of pa

The smiles of his

rental kindness is interrupted. mother, those tender admonitions, and the solicitous care of both his parents, are no longer before his eyes-year after year he feels himself more and more detached from them, 'till at last, he is so effectually weaned from the connexion, as to find himself happier any where than in their company.

I should have been glad of a frank for this Letter, for I have said but little, of what I could say, upon the subject, and perhaps I may not be able to catch it by the end again. If I can, I shall add to it hereafter.

Yours,

W. C

LETTER LXVII.

To the Revd. WILLIAM UNWIN,

MY DEAR FRIEND,

Oct. 5, 1780.

Now for the sequel-

you have anticipated one of my arguments in favour of a private education, therefore I need say but little about it. The folly of supposing that the mothertongue, in some respects the most difficult of all tongues, may be acquired without a teacher, is predominant in all the public schools, that I have ever heard of. To pronounce it well, to speak, and to write it with fluency and elegance, are no easy attainments; not one in fifty of those, who pass through Westminster and Eton, arrive at any remarkable proficiency in these accomplishments; and they that do, are more indebted to their own study, and application for it, than to any instruction received there. In general, there is nothing so pedantic as the style of a school-boy, if he aims at any style at all, and if he does not, he is of course inelegant, and perhaps ungrammatical. A defect, no doubt, in great measure, owing to want of cultivation, for the same lad that is often commended for his Latin, frequently would

deserve to be whipped for his English, if the fault were not more his master's, than his own. I know not where this evil is so likely to be prevented as at home-supposing always, nevertheless, (which is the case in your instance) that the boy's parents, and their acquaintance, are persons of elegance and taste themselves. For to converse with those, who converse with propriety, and to be directed to such authors, as have refined and improved the language by their productions, are advantages which he cannot elsewhere enjoy in an equal degree. And though it requires some time to regulate the taste, and fix the judgment, and these effects must be gradually wrought even upon the best understanding, yet Į suppose, much less time will be necessary for the purpose, than could at first be imagined, because the opportunities of improvement are continual,

A public education is often recommended as the most effectual remedy for that bashful and awkward restraint, so epidemical among the youth of our country. But I verily believe, that instead of being a cure, it is often the cause of it. For seven or eight years of his life, the boy has hardly seen or conversed with a man, or a woman, except the maids at his boarding house. A gentleman, or a lady, are con