which hath been frequently printed at London, and since translated into French. It is asserted, that this dicourse influenced the public benevolence to endow an Hospital for Inoculation. If indeed, the Bishop of Worcester hath participated this kind of glory with Vincent de Paul, it must be acknowledged, that Eloquence could not obtain a more excellent triumph. This sermon is an interesting dissertation, and new as to its object; but the prelate, who delivered it, will never be placed in the rank of Orators. Destitute of imagination, and of sensibility, he wanders into abstract calculations respecting population; into low details about the secondary fever; and after having exhausted all those combinations, certainly more suited to a medicinal school than a Christian assembly, he quotes the testimonies and authority of Messrs. Ranby, Hawkins, and Middleton, surgeons of London, of whom he speaks with as much veneration as if they were Fathers of the Church. * 1752, was much admired, and contributed greatly to extend the practice of Inoculation. He published some other single sermons. s.-Born about the year 1696-Died in 1759. U Encyclopædia Britannică, The more we read foreign Orators, the more we perceive the pre-eminence of the French preachers. The Spaniards and Germans are yet in the rudiments of Christian Eloquence. Father Seignery has been for some time extolled as the Bourdaloue of Italy. He hath been translated. His most zealous partisans have given him up. How indeed, can we admire ridiculous passages and popular fables, which we should scarcely tolerate in instructions to country villagers ? SECTION XLIX. OF M. THOMAS, AND THE REVOLUTION WHICH HE EFFECTED IN THE STYLE OF RHETORICAL COMPOSITION. NOTWITHSTANDING the superiority of the models, which the age of Louis XIV. hath furnished, as well as the distinguished talents of many writers, who devoted themselves to the ministry of the gospel, Eloquence seemed to be buried in the tomb with Massillon. Most of the preachers, who succeeded him, were desirous of opening to themselves a new road, where they had at first, brilliant success, for which they have since severely suffered. They invented an affected and effeminate jargon, and, by dint of labour, they rendered themselves unintelligible. Ah! wherefore did they wish to banish simplicity? Was it because they were ignorant that one of the secrets of rhetorical composition consists in making use of those lively, natural, and varied modes of expression, which are adopted in conversation, in addition to such a selection of words as may be always excellent, without ever being far-fetched?* The rhetoricians, here spoken of, wrote with the most tedious prolixity, and were equally strangers to the precision of thought and diction. We perceive in their discourses pompous expressions, vulgar ideas, and that affectation of wit, which is incompatible with Eloquence. Words are like leaves; and where they most abound, 'Much fruit of sense beneath is rarely found. • False Eloquence, like the prismatic glass, Its gaudy colours spreads on ev'ry place; The face of Nature we no more survey, All glares alike, without distinction gay: • But true expression, like th' unchanging sun, Clears and improves whate'er it shines upon, It gilds all objects, but it alters none. Expression is the dress of thought, and still < Appears more decent as more suitable; For diff'rent styles with diff'rent subjects sort, 'As sev'ral garbs with country, town and court. POPE'S Essay on Criticism, v. 312. A want of genius, however, is not what we can charge upon these corrupters of Christian Eloquence, unless we should be of opinion, that owing to their deficiency in this respect, they discovered too strong an affectation of it. They wrote without animation or fire; they confounded the gift of persuasion with the art of dazzling; and after having perverted the taste of the public, they have succeeded in exciting an admiration of their faults. Eloquence, become a stranger to the works of learned men, was still cultivated by a small number of real Orators, whom popular opinion placed far below all those fashionable declaimers. But, in the history of the arts there are remarkable epochs, when a superior writer recalls the public attention towards those methods which have been abandoned, and draws along with him a number, who follow him in the course in which he himself has excelled. Such is the glory, which M. Thomas hath had among us. He contributed to the fortunate revolution, which has renewed the taste in Oratory for panegyrics: in these, he hath displayed as much Eloquence, as Fontenelle had discovered of penetration.* He inspired the most lively en * FONTENELLE was a celebrated French author, and pronounced by Voltaire the most universal genius of the age of Louis XIV. He wrote on a variety of subjects, particularly a number of panegyrics on the deceased members of the Academy of Sciences, to which he had been appointed perpetual secretary. See New and General Biographical Dict. thusiasm for great men. He improved the mind by the excellence of his sentiments. He directed his discourses to an useful object. He, in a particular manner, promoted the utility of his writings by collecting them together, and enriching them with his Essay on Panegyrics.' The works of the eulogist of Marcus Aurelius ought to be ever dear to us by so interesting and unusual a conjunction of erudition, genius and virtue. SECTION L. OF THE USE OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. HE style, that M. Thomas cultivated, pos THE sesses much of that manner, so well adapted for the pulpit, by the elevation of the ideas, and the moral strain, which is generally to be found in them.-Do we wish to see the example of this writer become serviceable to preachers? Let us recollect, that, in the corruption of Eloquence, the language of Religion was forgotten; and that, in order to impart to our ministry its former lustre, we must, at once, become Orators, and Christian Orators. It is by incessantly reading the Holy Scriptures that we learn to speak that spiritual language, |