But with such gard'ning tools as art, yet rude, -Paradise Lost, 9: Milton. Not less but more heroic than the wrath Or Neptune's ire or Juno's, that so long -Idem, 9. Sometimes, too, such allusions in the best poetry, are explained or rendered picturesque, as in the following: Do you believe me yet, or shall I call Hence had the huntress Dian her dread bow, Fear'd her stern frown, and she was queen o' th' woods. What was that snaky-headed Gorgon shield, That wise Minerva wore, unconquer'd virgin, Wherewith she freezed her foes to congeal'd stone, But rigid looks of chaste austerity, And noble grace that dash'd brute violence With sudden adoration and blank awe? -Comus: Milton. It is not merely in historical or mythological allusions, however, that the main thought of a passage can be so mixed with the illustrating figures as to destroy their representative character. The same tendency will be recognized in the following: Yes, the pine is the mother of legends; what food For their grim roots is left when the thousand-yeared wood- Light, sinewy, graceful, firm-set as the wing From Michael's white shoulder-is hewn and defaced And its wrecks seek the ocean it prophesied long, Then the legends go with them-even yet on the sea And the sailor's night watches are thrilled to the core -The Growth of the Legend: Lowell. In contrast with this, notice how clearly both thoughts and figures, and the thoughts by means of the figures, stand out in poetry that is truly representative: Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne,— Virtue? a fig! 't is in ourselves that we are thus or thus. Our bodies are gardens to the which our wills are gardeners; so that if we will plant nettles, or sew lettuce; set hyssop, and weed up thyme; supply it with one gender of herbs, or distract it with many; either to have it sterile with idleness, or manured with industry; why the power and corrigible authority of this lies in our wills. -Othello, i., 3: Shakespear. You have seen Sunshine and rain at once; her smiles and tears -Lear, iv., 3: Idem. Through tatter'd clothes small vices do appear; And like a scurvy politician seem .. Get thee glass eyes; -Idem, iv., 6. CHAPTER XXVI. ORNAMENTAL ALLOY IN REPRESENTATION. Poetic Development of the far-fetched Simile in the Illustrating of Illustrations-Examples of this from several Modern Writers-Whose Representation or Illustration fails to represent or illustrate-Poetic Development of the Mixed Metaphor-Examples from Modern Poets-In what will this result-More Examples-How the Tendency leads the Poet from his Main Thought to pursue Suggestions made even by Sounds-Representing thus a Lack of Sanity or of Discipline, neither of which is what Art should represent. UR examination of the effects upon poetry of the didactic tendency, in which considerations of thought overbalance those of form, have led us to trace certain phases of failure to a lack of representation. We have now to examine the effects of the ornate tendency, in which considerations of form overbalance those of thought, and in which therefore there is failure because of an excess of representation. It is simply natural for one who has obtained facility in illustrating his ideas to overdo the matter, at times, and to carry his art so far as to re-illustrate that which has been sufficiently illustrated or is itself illustrative. The first form that we need to notice, in which this tendency shows itself, is a poetic development and extension of what rhetoricians term the "far-fetched" simile, a simile in which minor points of resemblance are sought out and dwelt upon in minute detail and at unnecessary length. Attention has been directed in another place to the way in which the exclusively allegorical treatment in Spenser's Faerie Queene causes us to lose sight of the main subject of the poem. An allegory, as has been said, is mainly an extended simile. The poetic fault of which I am to speak is sometimes found in similes, sometimes in allegories, and sometimes in episodes filled with metaphorical language, partaking partly of the distinctive nature of both. These passages seem to be suggested as illustrations of the main subject, but they are so extended and elaborated that they really obscure it. As the reader goes on to peruse them, he either forgets altogether what the subject to be illustrated is, or he finds himself unable to separate that which belongs only to it, from that which belongs only to the illustration. It is largely owing to passages manifesting this characteristic that Robert Browning's writings seem obscure to so many. Most persons would be obliged to read the following, for example, two or three times before understanding it, and this because of the difficulty they experience in separating the particulars of the passage that go with the main thought from those that go with the illustrating thought; in other words, the excess of representation in the form interferes with its clearness. The man is witless of the size, the sum, * Should his child sicken unto death,-why, look For scarce abatement of his cheerfulness, Or pretermission of his daily craft— While a word, gesture, glance, from that same child Will start him to an agony of fear, The reason why-"'t is but a word," object "A gesture"-he regards thee as our lord Who lived there in the pyramid alone, Looked at us, dost thou mind, when being young Some charm's beginning, from that book of his, Thrown o'er your heads from under which ye both Which runs across some vast distracting orb -An Epistle. It must be confessed, however, that these episodes of Browning are often very charming to those who have come to understand them, e. g. : And hereupon they bade me daub away. Thank you! my head being crammed, their walls a blank, Never was such prompt disemburdening. First, every sort of monk, the black and white, I drew them, fat and lean: then, folks at church, |