No. XXXI.-On the pretence of FIGURATIVE ALLU- No. XXXII.-Arguments to prove the sacrificial lan- guage of the New Testament figurative, urged by No. XXXIII.-On the sense entertained generally by No. XXXIV.-On H. Taylor's objection, of the want of a literal correspondence between the MOSAIC SACRIFICE and the DEATH OF CHRIST .......... No. XXXVI.-On the meaning of the word translated ATONEMENT, in the OLD TESTAMENT 243 245 247 297 322 No. XLI. On the divine institution of sacrifice, and No. XLII.-On the Death of Christ as a TRUE PRO- PITIATORY SACRIFICE for the sins of mankind No. XLIII.-On the inconsistency of the reasoning No. XLIV. On the nature of the SACRIFICE FOR SIN 484 No. XLV. On the effect of the doctrine of Atonement, No. XLVI.-On the supposition that sacrifice origi - ..... nated in PRIESTCRAFT.. 1 2 18 No. XLIX.-Sacrifices explained as FEDERAL RITES.. 21 28 No. LI. The supposition that sacrifices originated in GIFTS, erroneous 30 No. LII. On the date of the permission of ANIMAL - No. LVII. On the objections against the supposition .... No. LIX.-On the history and the book of Joв..... nature of Abel's sacrifice the sacrifices of CAIN and ABEL No. LXV. On the true interpretation of the passage, No. LXVI. On the comparison between the sacrifice No. LXVII.-On the nature of SACRIFICE BEFORE THE No. LXIX.-On the CORRESPONDENCE between the sa crificial language of the Old Testament, and that employed in the New to describe Redemption by the Death of Christ: and the original adaptation of the former to the subject of the latter Postscript to Number LXIX: on BOLINGBROKE and No. LXX.-On the CORRESPONDENCE between the An- No. LXXI.-On the nature and import of the ceremony No. LXXII.-Socinian objections urged by a Divine of the Established Church, against the doctrine of the vicarious import of the Mosaic sacrifices, and against PREFATORY ADDRESS. TO THE STUDENTS IN DIVINITY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. THE following Discourses, originally composed with a view to your instruction, are now with the same design submitted to your more deliberate examination. In these latter days, Christianity seems destined to undergo a fiercer trial, than it has for many centuries experienced. Its defenders are called upon, not merely to resist the avowed invader, who assails the citadel from without, but the concealed and treacherous foe, who undermines the works, or tampers with the garrison within. The temporising Christian, who, under the mask of liberality, surrenders the funda 1 |