Obrazy na stronie

Sale by Auction.

Miscellaneous Books, MSS., Parchment Deeds, &c.

& CO. will SELL

AUCTION, at their Rooms, 115, Chancery Lane, W.C., on WEDNESDAY, January 13, and Following Day, at 1 o'clock, MINCELLANEOUS BOOKS, including the Library of the late W. T. BROWNE (of Chetham's Library, Manchester), sold by order of the Executor, comprising a Collection of Books on Calligraphy, Penmanship, Secret Writing, and Shorthand-Hasted's History of Kent, 12 vols., with the Plates to the Folio Edition-Books with Coloured Plates-First Editions - Coloured Caricatures and Books on the Caricaturists-Scrap Books, &c.; also an EXTENSIVE COLLECTION OF SIXTEENTH, SEVENTEENTH, AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURY DEEDS on Parchment, relating to Property in various English Counties-MSS. of Antiquarian and Genealogical InterestLetters and Documents relating to America.

Catalogues on application.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Established 1890. ISSUED SATURDAYS.

"OUT OF PRINT." When your bookseller gives you that reply, or you want a SCARCE BOOK, tell him to advertise in THE CLIQUE (the ONLY organ of the Antiquarian Book-Trade) and he is SURE TO GET IT.

Advertisements inserted for booksellers only.

The readers of THE CLIQUE hold between them SEVENTY MILLION VOLUMES, so you see how certain you are to get the ONE VOLUME you want.

THE CLIQUE is issued to booksellers only, 88. 8d. per annum, expiring December 31. Subscribers joining now should remit at the rate of 2d. per week till December 31, 1915.

All the eminent booksellers of the world advertise in THE CLIQUE.


[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]


The Antiquarian Bookseller's


(Partners: T. G. & W. E. GAWTHORP, F.S.A.Scot.)
By Appointment to H.M. KING GEORGE V.




Notes and Queries Office, Bream's Buildings, Chancery Lane, E.O.





Price 4d.; by post 4hd.

Containing an Account of the Flag,
Reprinted June, 1908.

With Coloured Illustration according to scale.

Notes and Queries Office,

Bream's Buildings, Chancery Lane, E.C.



[ocr errors]


CONTENTS.-No. 262.

NOTES:-An Analogy to Sir Thomas Browne, 1-The

Literary Frauds of Henry Walker the Ironmonger, 2-

Holcroft Bibliography, 4-The Prologue to Eastward

Hoe,' 5-Printing at Pontypool-"From China to Peru,"

6-Poem attributed to Dr. Johnson-The Founder of the

Hulme Trust-"The Day Cousamah," 7

QUERIES:-Name of Play Wanted, 7-William Thompson,

d. 1775-Botolph Lane-Nathaniel Cooke-Sir Everard

Digby's Letters-Saluting the Quarter-deck - Bishop

Douglas's Virgil: The Sibyl, 8-Oliver Cromwell of

Uxbridge - Henry Crownfield

Piræus mistaken for a man East Anglian Families:

Elizabeth Stainton-Newnham Family-Luke Robinson,

Old Etonians - "The

It is at this point that I bring in my





"Spiritual members"-"Sound as a roach "-"Madame

"We'll go to Kew in lilac time"-Kentish

Tokens-Baptism of Clovis, 18.

NOTES ON BOOKS:-Whitaker's Almanack and Peerage

-Papers of the Hampshire Field Club- The Library

Journal'-' Winter's Pie'-'The Cornhill.'

Notices to Correspondents.

M.P.-Williamson of Annan, 9.

REPLIES:-Lieut. Col. Thomas Carteret Hardy, 10-The

Kingdom of Fife-Beszant Family-Detectives in Fiction,

11-Fielding's 'Tom Jones' its Geography - Medallic jecture."

Legends-The Titled Nobility of Europe'-Heraldry of

Lichfield Cathedral - Fire and New-Birth, 12-Author

Wanted - Borstal-The Height of St. Paul's-Shake- peculiar coincidence. While on a visit to

speariana: "Hallooing "-Alphabetical Nonsense, 13- New Orleans, Louisiana, some four years ago,

"Holy Thursday "-Modern Advocate of Druidism-De

Tassis, the Spanish Ambassador temp. James I.-Regent the one custom that appeared to me very

Circus, 14-Scots Guards: Regimental Histories-Wild strange was the method of burial there

Early Steam Engines, 15- George IV.'s

Natural Children-Timothy Skottowe, 16- Quotations practised. Instead of interring the dead

Wanted - Moyle Wills-"Thirmuthis," 17-O'Neill below the surface of the ground, as has been

the custom of the majority of Christian

peoples throughout modern times, they bury

their dead in a wall built around the outside

of the cemetery. This wall is about six feet

in width, and, besides encompassing the

burial-ground, also crosses the cemetery

through the centre. It is divided into

sections, each section being about two feet

square at the mouth, and about as deep as

the wall itself. When a person dies they

place the corpse in a copper casket, tapering

at both ends, with a top that can be opened.

When the corpse is within, the casket is

hermetically sealed, and placed in the section

of the wall belonging to that particular

family, and then the mouth of the section is

cemented up. When another member of

that family dies the section is broken open,

the casket removed and opened, the bones

of the preceding corpse dumped out on the

floor of the section, and the second corpse

buried in precisely the same manner as was

the first. This continues for years, until

finally the section contains nothing but the

bones and dust of many a victim of death.

When the section is full it is closed up, never

to be opened, and another section is designed

for the use of that family.

This is done because the Mississippi River

often overflows, as a result of the spring rains

and floods, and submerges the city with

several feet of water. Obviously, if people

were buried sub terra, the cemetery would

become a breeding-ground for diseases of all

kinds, and terrible results might ensue.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Upon exploring further, it was found that
the square had three successive floors about
two feet below one another. Pots were dis-
covered in some of these floors corresponding
to the one described above, although some of
them were found to be entirely empty. Sir
Thomas Browne makes no conjecture as to
what race these pots belonged to, or in what
period they were placed in position. He
simply says that "what work this was
we must as yet reserve unto better con-


To my mind the walls discovered in Brampton correspond to the walls at present used in our own country, although I admit this holds true in only a rough way. Should I be assuming too much were I to say that these Brampton walls were once above ground, or at least in some cave or grotto? Their depth in the earth upon discovery might be due to gradual changes that had taken place in the topography and physiography of the neighbourhood. As to any doubt that might arise concerning the survival of the brick walls through so many centuries without wearing away and finally disappearing, I might offer as an example the artificial mounds and walls lately brought to light in North America. These were built during the Pleistocene Age. Or if the Brampton burial walls were constructed in a cave, they very probably were not submerged in earth until recent times, when the

roof of the cave fell in.

Whether the walls were built in a cave or on the surface of the ground, the important fact is that their peculiar construction, in coincidence with the method of burial in New Orleans, brings forth the idea of the topographical changes that have occurred in England. Was the region around Brampton at one time in the vicinity of a large river, or did the sea approach close thereto, making the wall method of burial compulsory? It is for those best fitted in this line of research to determine. KENNETH M. LEWIS. Short Hills, New Jersey, U.S.


(See 11 S. x. 441, 462, 483, 503.)



PUBLISHED on 3 Feb., 1648, nearly a whole year before the King was beheaded, and professing (inferentially) to be a report of a conference between the Lords and the Co nmons about taking action against the King, this book is the most important fraud in English history. It is usually catalogued to the esuit Father Robert Persons, or Parsons, who, or Verstegan, wrote the original book, of which this was a piracy. The original is a rare work, owing to the steps taken to suppress it when it was published. The following is the title of the

[ocr errors]


[blocks in formation]

The origin and history of this book have been exhaustively treated by the Rev. J. H. Pollen, S.J., in a paper entitled 'The Question of Queen Elizabeth's Successor,' printed in The Month for May, 1903. Father Pollen seemed to incline to the view that its printer, Verstegan, poet and antiquary, was its author, rather than Father Persons, though I understand that he has since somewhat modified his opinion. The work is a learned one, but met, and still meets, with condemnation on all sides, both Catholic and Protestant. What is quite certain is that no controversial work ever had a stranger after-history. The full title of Walker's piracy deserves citation, if only to show how he succeeded in changing the original object of the book :

"Severall Speeches delivered at a Conference concerning the power of Parliament to proceed against their King for misgovernment.

"In which is stated :

"I. That government by blood is not by Law of Nature or divine, but only by human and positive laws of every particular Commonwealth, and may upon just causes be altered.

"II. The particular forme of monarchies and kingdomes, and the different lawes whereby they are to be obtained, holden and governed, in divers countries, according as each Commonwealth hath chosen and established.

kings, and yet how divers of them have been "III. The great reverence and respect due to lawfully chastised by their Parliaments and Commonwealths for their misgovernment, and of the good and prosperous successe that God hath commonly given to the same.


Princes; what interest Princes have in their IV. The lawfulnesse of proceeding against subject's goods or lives; how oathes do binde or may be broken by subjects towards their Princes, and, finally, the difference between a good King and a tyrant.

admitting to their authority & the othes [sic] "V. The coronation of Princes and manner of which they doe make in the same, unto the Commonwealth, for their good government.

[graphic][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Yorkshire and Parliament man, bought Doleman of Corn. Bee at the King's Arms in Little Britain and gave it to Walker.'

"Dr. Barlow's note [in the Bodleian copy] is this, in a spare leaf before the title: This base and treacherous pamphlet is, verbatim, the first part of Francis Doleman [Parsons was the man under that name] touching succession to the Crown. These nine speeches, as here they call them, are the nine chapters in Doleman. And this was printed at the charge of the Parliament, 30 pound being paid to the printer, "in perpetuam eorum infamiam." See the collection of His Majesties gracious messages for peace, p. 125, 120. The messages were collected and printed with observations upon them by Mr. Simons. The said traiterous pamphlet [' Several Speeches '] was put out by. Walker, an ironmonger (from that he came to be a cowherd) [?]. When the King came into London about the five members he threw into his coach a traiterous pamphlet, call'd "To thy tents, O Israel" (vid. Lambert Wood's History). He afterwards writ the Perfect Occurrences, and now [1649] is made a minister by the Presbyterians [?]. Mr. Darby, a

Walker was the last person the Presby. terians would have made a minister. He was preferred to benefices at Uxbridge and at Knightsbridge by the Rump (in the latter place his parishioners petitioned against him), and Cromwell gave him the living of St. Martin's Vintry. "Mr. Darby" is probably a mistake for Henry Darley. Cornelius Bee was a well-known bookseller.

On 6 May, 1648, the following book-of which the press-mark is E. 438. (19.)appeared: The King's most gracious messages for peace and a personal treaty.' The following extract is from pp. 125–7 in it :


[ocr errors]

They [the Parliament] pretended great enmity unto popish doctrine and tenents, and episcopacy was pull'd down out of zeale against With popery (as if that had been a friend to it). what clamours did they represent to the people Secretary Windebank's intercourse with Jesuits and popish priests. And yet these very men have permitted Mabbot (the allowed broker of all these venomous scribblings) to authorise the printing a book of Parsons the jesuite, full of the most popish and treasonable positions that ever were vented, for very good doctrine. Nay, more then this; have they not contributed 301. when, after its publication, it was told them by towards the charge of printing the same, and some that the said booke had been condemned

by Parliament in the 35 of Queen Elizabeth and that the printer thereof was drawn, hang'd and quarter'd for the same [?], and that it was then enacted that whosoever should have it in their When house should be guilty of High Treason. all this was related to some of the Committee of it? Their own consciences know all this to be Examinations, did they not stop their ears at true, and that we are able to prove it before the world. Yet these be the men, forsooth, that hate Popery.

"This popish booke that we speak of was first published anno 1594, under the name of Dolman,. and intituled A Conference about the succession of the Crowne.' It consists of two partes, whereof the first conteines the discourse of a civill lawyerHow and in what manner propinquity of blood is to be preferred. It is divided into nine chapters, all which this blessed reforming Parliament hath now published under the title of 'Severall Speeches," &c. They were all answered (as they are in the Jesuites book) by Sir John Haward [Hayward], Doctor of the Civil Law, in the year 1603, and dedicated to King James, which answer is common in booksellers' shops, still to be sold. Now there is no difference betwixt this book published by this Parliament and that of the jesuite condemned by that other an. 35 Eliz. but onely this, when the jesuit mentions the apostles he adds the word 'Saint to their names, 'S. John. S. James. S. Peter,' which the author of this new edition leaves out, and saies plain John, James and Peter. And perhaps in some places the word Parliament is put instead of the word Pope' or 'People." Nay the variation is so little that it speaks the


publisher a very weak man, and those that set him on the work none of the wisest in employing so simple an animal in a businesse of so great concernment; we shall instance but in one passage.

“Old Dolman, or Parsons, had said in the year 1594 that many were then living who had seen the severall coronations of King Edw. the 6 Queen Mary, and Queen Eliz. and could witnesse, &c. Now our young Dolman, or Walker, for that is the wiseman's name, supposing that all these people were alive still that were old men 54 years agoe, like a true transcriber affirmeth confidently, without the variation of a letter, in pag 43 of his addition, that many are yet living in England that have seen the severall coronations of King Edw. the 6, Queen Mary and Queen Eliz., to which he also addeth King James and King Charls, because they were crowned since. And this, we confesse, is new in him."

There is a great deal of comment on this book in Prynne's Speech' of 4 Dec., 1648, but I do not set it out because Prynne does not mention Walker's name. The Man in the Moon for 27 June-4 July, 1649, says that Cromwell

[ocr errors][merged small]

"hired that factotum of villainous impostur-
isme,' Walker, with 301., to reprint a book of one
Doleman's, a jesuit (that was formerly hang'd,
drawn and quarter'd for the same) to justifie that
unparallel'd and inhuman murder of butchering
the King. The said book is new dipped by our
blest reformers and entituled 'Severall Speeches,'
&c. [ut supra], and these coppies were cunningly
conveyed into the hands of Bradshaw and the
regicides as a catechism to instruct them in the (See
devil's horn book, written in bloody characters, of
the murdered Saints and servants of God. And
the seeds of this crop of villainy was by perjur'd
Noll committed to the care of that saffron bearded
Judas, Walker, a villain sold to work mischief,
tell lyes and print and divulge their rogueries.
One that I am persuaded that for all parts in the
science of Schisme cannot be matched in the
three kingdomes. Nay not in Christendome, nor
in Europe."


A Treatise concerning the Broken Succession of the Crowne of England, Inculcated about the later end of the Reigne of Queen Elizabeth. Not Impertinent for the better compleating of the information intended. London. Printed Anno Dom. 1655."

There was a postscript to this edition,

and it ran as follows:

the substance of what was written and published by Father Parsons, the Jesuit, under the name of Doleman, for ends best known to themselves, but justly suspected to be no way for the freedom of for the wisdom of later times to prevent those the English nation, may give the greater occasion threaten a second part of that horrid design of commotions towards confusion as might seem to the Gunpowder treason, November 5. 1605."

"This manuscript [sic] treatise of broken successions of the Crown of England, coming from the hands of a Popish priest and comprehending

The motive of this and of his attempt to stigmatize the Royalists as equally guilty with Guy Fawkes is shown by Walker's remark, made apropos of nothing at all, and simply slipped in among his general news in his Perfect Proceedings, No. 293, for 3-10 May, 1655 (last page): 66 'I think we may beg his highnesse to take the Crowne."

Finally, Father Persons's unlucky book was reprinted in 1681, in order to support the enemies of James, Duke of York, afterwards James II. Never was there such an unlucky book for the House of Stuart. J. B. WILLIAMS. (To be continued.)



11 S. x. 1, 43, 83, 122, 163, 205, 244, 284, 323, 362, 403, 442, 484.)


1798. [Never published.] 'Indian Exiles.' Under this title Holcroft projected, attempted, and completed a translation of Kotzebue's play 'Die Indianer in England (1791). That Holcroft wrote such a play is fairly certain from the evidence of the 'Memoirs,' where there are definite statements concerning the work. On 12 Oct., 1798 (p. 196), he wrote:

Indian in England,' which has employed me five "Finished translating the first act of Kotzebue's or six days; and as I intend essentially to alter the character of Samuel or Balaam, more time will be employed in a revisal. This character has keeping in the original, but not enough of the vis comica."

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small]
« PoprzedniaDalej »