Degree to Which Project Managers Have Implemented Risk Management Planning, Identification, Evaluation and Strategies Within Information Systems ProjectsThe purpose and overall goal of the study is to further develop an understanding of the degree to which Information Systems project managers have implemented risk management planning, identification, evaluation and strategies within projects. The population selected for study consisted of 651 Information Systems Development (ISD) project managers who are responsible for managing the ISD components of projects who are members of the Project Management Institute Information Systems Specific Interest Group (PMI-ISSIG). With almost 90,000 members worldwide, PMI is the leading nonprofit professional association in the area of Project Management. The survey was constructed using the Project Risk Management Processes Checklist to determine the nature of risk management processes utilized within ISD projects. As well, the survey was development using the Risk Management Maturity Checklist for the purposes of constructing questions to assess the degree to which risk project management activities are occurring as well as the level of risk-maturity associated with these efforts. The research design selected for the study was an exploratory survey design. The implementation of an exploratory survey design permits the researcher to explore and discover relationships among a large number of variables within a study. The main purpose is to establish whether two variables are related, and if so, establish the direction of the observed relationship. Using comparisons of means, it was found that on average, both years experience and education level effected how respondents viewed risk management strategies. In general, as education increased and as years experience increased, respondents thought that risk management strategies were being employed more often. It appears that when upper management and clients were involved in the implementation of risk management techniques, those techniques were far more likely to be implemented across the board. |
Co mówią ludzie - Napisz recenzję
Nie znaleziono żadnych recenzji w standardowych lokalizacjach.
Spis treści
1 | |
Statement of the Problem | 19 |
Definitions25 | 25 |
Figure Page | 32 |
Overview of Project Risk Management | 51 |
Risk Management Maturity | 62 |
METHODOLOGY | 69 |
Proposed Data Analyses Techniques | 77 |
Comparison of the Means | 86 |
Overall Effects | 87 |
Spearmans Correlations | 91 |
Regression Analysis | 92 |
Regression Analysis ANOVA | 93 |
Summary of the Findings | 98 |
Limitations of the Study | 104 |
Conclusions and Recommendations | 106 |
Table Page 1 Frequency Distribution for Respondents Education | 82 |
Distribution of Respondents Years Experience | 83 |
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
Agree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Strongly Artto and Hawk basis of educational Chapter client involvement Comparisons of means degree dependent variable Disagree Strongly Disagree educational level and/or effective evaluation and strategies exogenous variables focus Hillson identified implemented risk management indicated Information Systems project ISD project managers level and/or number managers have implemented measure methodologies null hypothesis operational risk management organization organizational risk management Percent Response Total PMBOK professional experience Project Management Institute project planning project risk management projects/organizations ranged from zero regression analysis Response Percent Response Response Total Strongly risk analysis Risk Management Maturity risk management perceived risk management planning risk management processes risk management strategies risk management techniques RMMM RMRDPC SDLC model Sisk skipped this question Spiral model Strongly Agree Agree survey system development team risk management techniques are currently Total Respondents Total Strongly Agree upper management variable created variable ranged zero to 16