Obrazy na stronie
PDF
ePub

not living persons whose whole character has been similarly changed by the self-same motive force-persons totally unknown one to another? And is it not so all over Christendom? Can these facts be denied? Are they not worthy of being studied, of being scientifically studied? Are you not bound as a philosopher to recognise these facts, and investigate them, applying to them your inductive method, seeking for some general law that will adequately account for them? Are phenomena of the moral world less capable of the inductive method than facts of the physical world? Take a corresponding case in the physical world. Men in days of

Was it

yore noticed how the waters of the sea, twice in twentyfour hours, came rising and swelling in this creek and in that creek, all along their coasts, and on inquiry they found it was so on other coasts, and in other seas, all round the globe. Was it a mere whim of the inconstant waves, not worthy of a philosopher's attention? not rather a mystery that challenged inquiry and investigation? And when every possible explanation, drawn from the winds or from the configuration of the shore, had been exhausted and had failed to account for it, was the inquiry abandoned? Was it not rather stimulated, men's minds never resting till a Newton or a Laplace had found the unseen mysterious power which the waters of the ocean were obeying; found it, not in this

denique martyria perperam coronata!" Ibid. c. 29. "Jam credere cœperam nullo modo Te fuisse tributurum tam excellentem illi Scripturæ per omnes jam terras auctoritatem, nisi et per ipsam Tibi credi et per ipsam Te quæri voluisses."-Aug. Conf. vi. 5.

C

earth, but where men had least suspected, in those distant heavenly orbs which night and day are looking down upon the face of the great deep, and exercising thereupon their strange attractive influence.

And are these phenomena of the moral world, men's wills and unruly passions, in all climes and in all ages, yielding themselves to obey a mighty unseen Power which controls them, less worthy matter for philosophic thought? Human hearts rising and heaving under one and the same mighty impulse all round the world, is not this a patent fact urgently demanding explanation?

And if, after exhausting every other hypothesis, philosophers find the only possible solution, not on earth but in heaven-in the conception of a Supreme Personal Being, the Father of the spirits of all flesh-why should they refuse assent?-nay, why should not they, too, enter the sanctuary, and learn to know Him with that deeper personal knowledge which that poor suffering woman in her sick chamber had attained to, and made her own for ever?

And now to sum up this chapter. We have glanced at some of the proofs commonly given of God's existence the proof from the reason of the thing (as men say), the proof of natural theology, and the moral proof resting on the conscience of mankind.

We have tried to show that there was vouchsafed to some, and those the holiest, a far more convincing proof, derived from a direct personal knowledge of God.

And, finally, we ventured to suggest that this last,

though attainable only by those who are within the sanctuary, was nevertheless to the philosopher outside well worthy of consideration. For was it not a plain, undeniable fact-as patent as any phenomenon of the natural world that numbers of men, and those the noblest, of every age and nation, were actuated by an unseen, mysterious Power, controlling them and constraining them to make efforts directly opposed to all the impulses of their common nature?

Thus we claim for our belief in God a truly scientific basis.

CHAPTER II.

The Doctrine of the Second Person of the Trinity.

WE

E saw in the first chapter that before any of us can attain to that deeper consciousness of God which grows out of communion with Him, the belief in God must have been in some way suggested to us. And we saw further, that the great majority of us owed the suggestion to our nurture within the pale of the Church.

The individual Christian may not require to know the grounds on which the Church's teaching ultimately rests; but clearly the Church is responsible for producing her reasons if required to do so; they are the title-deeds of her inheritance.

This leads us at once to Revelation, and so to the second Article of our Creed, on which we must now enter; and, indeed, it is most true, we cannot understand the Church's faith in the first Article of her Creed unless we go farther, and seek to understand her faith in the second.

We could never have really believed in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, unless we had learned to believe also in Jesus Christ His only Son our Lord. We cannot claim the blessing of that know

ledge of God which is life eternal, unless we complete the verse, "This is life eternal, to know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent.”

For what saith St. John's Gospel in another place? "No man hath seen God at any time: the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him" (i. 18). And what was the answer to Philip when he said, "Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us"? 66 'Jesus saith unto Him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?" (xiv. 9.)

We

This, then, is our Church's answer to any one who asks us whence we derive our knowledge of God. derive it from a revelation made by One who, eighteen hundred years ago, declared Himself to be the Son of God.

This is our answer. But this answer lays us open to the further question, "On what grounds do you believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God?" To this question we must be prepared to make answer. But here let me once more guard myself. When I say we must be prepared to answer this question, I do not mean that each Christian must be prepared to answer it. Is every soldier responsible for knowing the grounds on which war has been declared before he draws his sword? every citizen responsible for understanding the policy of his country before he pays a tax to carry out that policy? It is enough for each to answer, "I accept in this matter the judgment of those in whom I have confidence."

Is

So

« PoprzedniaDalej »