Obrazy na stronie







6 To do something to instruct, but more to undeceive, the timid and admiring student;-
to excite him to place more confidence in his own strength, and less in the infallibility of
great names;-to help bim to emancipate his judgment from the shackles of authority ;-to
teach him to distinguish between shewy language and sound sense;-to warn him not to pay
himself with words;-to shew him that what may tickle the ear or dazzle the imagination, will
not always inform the judgment;-to dispose him rather to fast on ignorance than to feed
himself with error."

Fragment on Government.





Printed for the Editor, by George Smallfield.



[merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Mr. Cogan's Summary of the Evidences of Christianity. Sie,

. is extant. This presumption is corroIN the year 1796, I printed a smal] borated by the consideration, that, as

I pamphlet on the Evidences of far as appears from the evidence of Christianity. It was thought of favour- history, it was the credit that was ably at the time by persons of whose actually given to the facts in question judgment I had a good opinion. I which caused the gradually-increasing have since been asked, whether it diffusion and establishment of Chriswould not be desirable that I should tianity. * reprint it. To this I should for several . Dr. Priestley, in his letters to a reasons object. The substance of it, Philosophical Unbeliever, (a work truly however, will be found in the following inestimable,) has the following para observations, which, if they appear to graph: “ With respect to hypotheses, you to be useful, you will not, per- to explain appearances of any kind, haps, think out of place in your Repo- the philosophical Christian considers sitory.

himself as bound to admit that which The Christian religion has existed (according to the received rules of for about 1800 years, and previous to philosophizing or reasoning) is the this period it did not exist. It derives most probable; so that the question its origin from a person called Jesus between him and other philosophers Christ, who lived in Judea, and was is, whether his hypothesis or theirs erucified by Pontius Pilate, the Roman will best explain the known facts, such governor. A short time after the as are the present belief of Judaism death of its founder, it was preached and Christianity, and also the belief of in the Roman empire by a few of his them in the earliest ages to which they followers, and gaired increasing credit can be traced.” With deference to and establishment, till at length it at an authority which I so Irighly respect, tained a decided pre-eminence above I should rather say, that until the New the Pagan religion and worship which Testament history has been shewn to had prevailed there for many ages, and be unworthy of credit, every hypowhich it finally overthrew. This con- thesis to explain the origin and proversion of the Pagans to Christianity gress of Christianity is unnecessary, must be considered as one of the most and consequently undeserving of attensignal revolutions which ever took tion. place upon earth, and is an event of Let it then be considered by what which every philosophical mind must wish to know the real and proper

• Let us suppose that we knew nocauses. The only history which ap

thing of the early history of Christianity, pears to account for this singular phe

but merely understood that it commenced nomenon is that of the New Testa

at the time at which its origin is dated, ment; and this history consists of a that it gradually subverted the idolatry clear and distinct narrative of facts, of the Heathen world, and that wherever which, if admitted, will readily explain it came it carried with it a pure system this extraordinary revolution. Hence of morality, and inspired a confident assuarises a claim which this history lays rance of a life to come. Let the Christo our attention, and likewise a strong tian Scriptures be put into our hands presumption in its favour: as it must with proper evidence of their authenticity. be allowed to stand in a very different

Should we not think that we had found predicament from a narrative of facts

the true cause of an extraordinary phe

nomenon ? Or should we think that the which will account for no existing

volume ought to be rejected because it phenomenon, and of which no monu

professed to give the narrative of a divine ment, except the historical testimony, interposition ?


« PoprzedniaDalej »