Method of inquiry-Nineteenth century finds Episcopacy in Christian Church must have had some original constitution- Silence in Scripture a sufficient confirmation of Episcopacy- Scripture not silent-Prelacy in harmony with mind of God- First ministers of religion-Distinction of ranks between Abram and Melchisedec-in Aaronic priesthood-among judges of THE CHURCH UNDER THE PERSONAL MINISTRY OF Our Lord shewn to have commenced the organisation of His The germ and the plant-The Church of the Personal Ministry and the Church of Pentecost-The Church no invisible company, but organised corporation under rule of Apostles-This organisa- tion completed by ordination of Seven-Preserved during growth In what sense Apostles had no successors-Authority to ordain and superintend capable of being transferred by them to suc- cessors-This authority exercised by themselves, not at outset only, but habitually-as long as each lived-Fresh members added to the Apostolic band of superintendents after the Church had been fairly started-Three orders throughout Scripture his- tory-Unfairness of our opponents' demands upon the Scripture record-Actual instances of Apostolic appointments of Prelates - Summary-Ordinations recorded in Scripture-In first period THE HISTORIES OF HEGESIPPUS AND EUSEBIUS. Summary of fourfold argument-Character of earliest Church according to Hegesippus and Eusebius-Church in Rome CHAPTER XI. THE EXAMINATION OF OBJECTIONS. Preface Objections against practical value of Episcopacy— CHAPTER XII. THE OPINIONS OF JEROME AND OTHERS. Jerome, why selected-His life, character, and authority- CHAPTER XIII. APOSTOLICAL SUCCESSION PRACTICALLY CONSIDERED. Pertinent question-Difficulty of giving away what we have CHAPTER XIV. APOSTOLICAL SUCCESSION SHEWN ΤΟ BE NEITHER The accusation-The succession one of offices not of persons- CHAPTER XV. - PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF THE SUBJECT. Greater and least commandments-Trust in the practical wis- Appendir. NOTE A.-On the parallelism between the external evidence NOTE B.-On the Irvingites, or members of the (so-called) N the year 1876 I was engaged to preach in a town in a neighbouring Diocese, in behalf of their Episcopal Endowment Fund. Before I had quite decided upon the precise line of my appeal, a Presbyterian friend directed my attention to a leading article in a local newspaper which has long been remarkable for its bitterness against the Church. The office of this paper has been burned, and I am unable to procure a copy of this article which I have never seen since. But, as well as I can remember, it contained sentences to this effect: "Episcopacy is too costly a luxury for a disendowed Church." "Prelacy contains a principle which would destroy any commercial undertaking." The "Church in the time of the Apostles did very well without it." "The Church of the first centuries did very well without it." "The Presbyterian Church in all its branches throughout all the world does very well without it." Those statements were of course ludicrously untrue and the article worthless. |