What Do Unions DoBasic Books, 17 maj 1984 - 293 This comprehensive economic assessment of unions by two Harvard economists challenges the prevailing view of trade unions as monopolies whose main function is to raise their members' wages at the expense of the general public. Using data from individuals and business establishments, they demonstrate that in addition to raising wages, unions have significant non-wage effects on industrial life. Unionization, they argue, often leads to higher productivity, more stable work force and provides protection for vulnerable employees. They describe the role of unions as the collective voice of workers, which creates a vehicle of direct communication between workers and management. |
Z wnętrza książki
Wyniki 1 - 3 z 28
Strona 246
... faces : a monopoly face and a voice / response face . If one looks only at the monopoly face , most of what unions do is socially harmful . If one looks only at the voice / response face , most of what unions do is socially beneficial ...
... faces : a monopoly face and a voice / response face . If one looks only at the monopoly face , most of what unions do is socially harmful . If one looks only at the voice / response face , most of what unions do is socially beneficial ...
Strona 247
... voice / response face of unions offset or dominate the negative elements of the monopoly face . As a result we come out with the following assessment - generally positive though not uniformly so of what unions do to the three major ...
... voice / response face of unions offset or dominate the negative elements of the monopoly face . As a result we come out with the following assessment - generally positive though not uniformly so of what unions do to the three major ...
Strona 248
... voice / response face of unionism and weaken the mo- nopoly face . Second , we should change the mode of organizing in ways that permit workers to choose union status , without undue manage- ment pressure on them . Strengthening the voice / ...
... voice / response face of unionism and weaken the mo- nopoly face . Second , we should change the mode of organizing in ways that permit workers to choose union status , without undue manage- ment pressure on them . Strengthening the voice / ...
Spis treści
The Figures and | 26 |
The Union Wage Effect | 43 |
Fringe Determination Under Trade Unionism | 61 |
Prawa autorskie | |
Nie pokazano 10 innych sekcji
Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
AFL-CIO analysis antilogs average blue-collar workers Bureau of Labor changes collective bargaining compared compensation contracts costs Current Population Survey differential earnings effect of unionism employees Employment Survey establishments estimated Exit-Voice favor figures fringe benefits grievance Harvard University higher impact of unionism Industrial and Labor Industrial Relations inequality J. L. Medoff job satisfaction Journal labor law Labor Relations Review Labor Statistics Landrum-Griffin Act layoffs legislation less lower major manufacturing ment monopoly wage National Longitudinal Survey NLRB elections nonunion firms nonunion workers percent plants policies political productivity profits Quality of Employment quit R. B. Freeman result senior workers social strikes studies Teamsters tenure tion Trade Unions turnover U.S. Department unfair labor practices union and nonunion union democracy union effect union members Union Nonunion union organizing union sector union status union wage effect union wage gains union workers unionism reduces unions raise United white-collar workers workforce