The Power of PrecedentOxford University Press, 12 lut 2008 - 352 The role that precedent plays in constitutional decision making is a perennially divisive subject among scholars of law and American politics. The debate rages over both empirical and normative aspects of the issue: To what extent are the Supreme Court, Congress, and the executive branch constrained by precedent? To what extent should they be? Taking up a topic long overdue for comprehensive treatment, Michael Gerhardt connects the vast social science data and legal scholarship to provide the most wide-ranging assessment of precedent in several decades. Updated to reflect recent legal cases, The Power of Precedent clearly outlines the major issues in the continuing debates on the significance of precedent and evenly considers all sides. For the Supreme Court, precedents take many forms, including not only the Court's past opinions, but also norms, historical practices, and traditions that the justices have deliberately chosen to follow. In these forms, precedent exerts more force than is commonly acknowledged. This force is encapsulated in the implementation and recognition of what Gerhardt calls the "golden rule of precedent," a major dynamic in constitutional law. The rule calls upon justices and other public authorities to recognize that since they expect others to respect their own precedents, they must provide the same respect to others' precedents. Gerhardt's extensive exploration of precedent leads him to formulate a more expansive definition of it, one that encompasses not only the prior constitutional decisions of courts but also the constitutional judgments of other public authorities. Gerhardt concludes his study by looking at what the future holds for the concept, as he examines the decisions and attitudes toward precedent exhibited by the shift from the Rehnquist to the Roberts Court. Authoritative and incisive, Gerhardt presents an in-depth look at this central yet understudied phenomenon at the core of all constitutional conflicts and one of undeniable importance to American law and politics. Ultimately, The Power of Precedent vividly illustrates how constitutional law is made and evolves both in and outside of the courts. |
Spis treści
Theories of Precedent | |
The Golden Rule | |
Nonjudicial Precedent | |
The Multiple Functions of Precedent | |
Super Precedent | |
Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
Alito arguing attitudinalists Bush Bush’s citation omitted cited commerce clause common law concurring Confirmation Hearing congressional constitutional adjudication constitutional decisions constitutional interpretation constitutional judgments constitutional law constitutional precedents constitutionality Court’s Court’s decisions decided dissenting doctrine Eleventh Amendment equal protection establishment clause federal Fºllº fºr Harv Hºllº impeachment instance institutions issue judges judicial decisions judicial precedents judicial review Justice Scalia legal scholars legislative majority Miranda Moreover network effects nomination nonjudicial authorities nonjudicial precedents normative ºil ºilº opinions overruling precedents overturning path dependency political practice President presidential Press prior question rational choice theorists reasons recognized Rehnquist Court Republican requires rule Samuel Alito Segal Seminole Tribe Senate significance ſº social Spaeth stare decisis statement statute suggest super precedent supra note Supreme Court theory U.S. Const United Univ upholding view of precedent votes weak view