One more, "Is incest not enough? And must there be adultery too? Grace after meat? Miscreant and Liar! Thief! Blackguard! Scoundrel! Fool! Hell-fire Is twenty times too good for you. "By that last book of yours we think All these Reviews the Devil made "What!" cried he, "this is my reward "What have I done to them?-and who I've half a mind to fight a duel. "Or," cried he, a grave look collecting, "Is it my genius, like the moon, Sets those who stand her face inspecting, That face within their brain reflecting, Like a crazed bell-chime, out of tune?" For Peter did not know the town, From God's own voice* in a review. All Peter did on this occasion Was, writing some sad stuff in prose. The Devil then sent to Leipsic fair, For Born's translation of Kant's book; A world of words, tail foremost, where Right-wrong-false-true-and foul-and fair, As in a lottery-wheel are shook. Five thousand crammed octavo pages I looked on them nine several days, And then I saw that they were bad; A friend, too, spoke in their dispraise,He never read them ;-with amaze I found Sir William Drummond had. When the book came, the Devil sent Fire, which ex luce præbens fumum, Made him beyond the bottom see Of truth's clear well-when I and you Ma'am, Go, as we shall do, subter humum, We may know more than he. Now Peter ran to seed in soul Furious he rode, where late he ran, This steed in vision he would ride, High trotting over nine-inch bridges, Over corn-fields, gates, and hedges. Vox populi, vox dei. As Mr. Godwin truly observes of a more famous saying, of some merit as a popular maxim, but totally destitute of philosophical accuracy. + Quasi, Qui valet verba :-i. e. all the words which have been, are, or may be expended by, for, against, with, or on him. A sufficient proof of the utility of this history. Peter's progenitor who selected this name seems to have possessed a pure anticipated cognition of the nature and modesty of this ornament of his posterity. After these ghastly rides, he came Home to his heart, and found from thence Much stolen of its accustomed flame; His thoughts grew weak, drowsy, and lame Of their intelligence. To Peter's view, all seemed one hue ; One single point in his belief So thought Calvin and Dominic ; So think their fierce successors, who His morals thus were undermined :- In the death hues of agony So in his Country's dying face He looked and lovely as she lay, Seeking in vain his last embrace, Wailing her own abandoned case, With hardened sneer he turned away: And coolly to his own soul said;— Her shroud for a new sheet I'll take. "My wife wants one.-Let who will bury This mangled corpse! And I and you, My dearest Soul, will then make merry, As the Prince Regent did with Sherry,― Ay-and at last desert me too." A famous river in the new Atlantis of the Dynastophylic Pantisocratists. † See the description of the beautiful colours produced during the agonising death of a number of trout, in the fourth part of a long poem in blank verse, published within a few years. That poem contains curious evidence of the gradual hardening of a strong but circumscribed sensibility, of the perversion of a penetrating but panicstricken understanding. The author might have derived a lesson which he had probably forgotten from these sweet and sublime verses. This lesson, Shepherd, let us two divide, Nature. "Pray find some cure or sinecure ; To feed from the superfluous taxes, A friend of ours-a poet-fewer Have fluttered tamer to the lure Than he." His lordship stands and racks his Stupid brains, while one might count As many beads as he had boroughs,- "It happens fortunately, dear Sir, No pledge from you, that he will stir That he'll be worthy of his hire." These words exchanged, the news sent off The Devil's corpse was leaded down; His decent heirs enjoyed his pelf, Mourning-coaches, many a one, Followed his hearse along the town:Where was the devil himself? When Peter heard of his promotion, His eyes grew like two stars for bliss: There was a bow of sleek devotion, Engendering in his back; each motion Seemed a Lord's shoe to kiss. He hired a house, bought plate, and made Peter was ever poor. It is curious to observe how often extremes meet. Cobbett and Peter use the same language for a different purpose: Peter is indeed a sort of metrical Cobbett. Cobbett is, however, more mischievous than Peter, because he pollutes a holy and now unconquerable cause with the principles of legitimate murder; whilst the other only makes a bad one ridiculous and odious. If either Peter or Cobbett should see this note, each will feel more indignation at being compared to the other than at any censure implied in the moral perversion laid to their charge. |