Court of Customs and Patent Appeals ReportsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1946 |
Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
18 C. C. P. A. Patents 72 USPQ acid affidavit alkyl alleged apparatus APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant's appellant's application appellee appellee's Associate Judges bimetallic strips Board of Appeals Braunbeck catalyst cellulose cited claim 11 Commissioner of Patents compound comprising counsel for appellant count Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined delivered the opinion descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure drive-in theater elements February 11 GARRETT HATFIELD heat held interference interference proceeding issue JACKSON lant's liquid machine mark material means metal method claims motor O'CONNELL operation Oral argument Patent Appeals Patent Office Patent Office affirming patentable subject matter portion Presiding Judge Primary Examiner prior art pyrophosphoric acid reduction to practice reference registration rejected claims resin rubber Serial sheet sodium chlorite specification strip structure subject matter supra surface temperature tetrathionate thereof tion trade-mark United States Court United States Patent unpatentable valve W. W. Cochran
Popularne fragmenty
Strona 1036 - A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim, not the subject of a pending action, which at the time of filing the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim...
Strona 803 - ... shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.
Strona 961 - This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined in the eight counts in issue (Nos.
Strona 719 - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
Strona 1133 - Now that it has succeeded, it may seem very plain to any one that he could have done it as well. This is often the case with inventions of the greatest merit. It may be laid down as a general rule, though perhaps not an invariable one, that if a new combination and arrangement of known elements produce a new and beneficial result, never attained before, it is evidence of invention.
Strona 828 - We think these decisions establish the doctrine on which we decide the present case, namely, that the acts for which a court of equity will on account of fraud net aside or annul a judgment or decree, between the same parties, rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction, have relation. to frauds, extrinsic or collateral, to the matter tried by the first court, and not to a fraud in the matter on which the decree was rendered...
Strona 723 - When an appeal is taken to the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, the appellant shall give notice thereof to the Commissioner, and shall file in the Patent Office his reasons of appeal, specifically set forth in writing...
Strona 1087 - Judge. This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from a decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office, one member dissenting, awarding to appellee priority of invention of the subject matter contained in four counts.
Strona 830 - Introduction of Automatic Glass Working Machinery; How Received by Organized Labor," which referred to "gob feeding" as one of the two "revolutionary devices" with which workmen skilled in bottle-blowing had been confronted since they had organized. After unsuccessfully attempting to persuade the President of the Bottle Blowers...
Strona 829 - The filing of a regular application for patent completely disclosing the invention is treated as equivalent to reduction to practice. The inventor who proves to be the first to conceive the invention and the first to reduce it to practice will be held to be the prior inventor, but more complicated situations cannot be stated this simply.