CONTENTS OF VOL. III.

SERMON I.

2 Tim. iii. 1-5.

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall

come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous,

boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, un-

thankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers,

false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are

good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more

than vers of God; having a form of godliness, but deny-

ing the power thereof

Page 1

SERMON II.

Psalm xiv. 1.

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God............ 35

SERMON III.

Psalm xiv. 1.

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God........... 66

SERMON IV.

Luke ix. 23.

-Let him deny himself.

....... 91

SERMON V.

Rom. viii. 34.

Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather

that is risen again...

117

140883

SERMON VI.

LUKE xvi. 9.

Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteous-

ness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into ever-

lasting habitations ...

.....151

SERMON VII.

LUKE xix. 8.

- And if I have defrauded any man by forged cavillation, I

restore unto him fourfold

..181

SERMON VIII.

GALAT. v. 5.

For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness

by faith

....208

SERMON IX.

1 Cor. x. 13.

- God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above

that ye are able-

.....253

ADDITIONAL DISCOURSES.

1. A Conference betwixt Mr. Chillingworth and Mr. Lew-

gar.

.278

II. A Discourse against the Infallibility of the Roman Church,

with an Answer to all those Texts of Scripture that are

alleged to prove it ....

.....307

III. A Conference concerning the Infallibility of the Roman

Church : proving, that the present Church of Rome either

errs in her worshipping the Blessed Virgin Mary, or that

the Ancient Church did err in condemning the Collyridians

as Heretics....

.....325

IV. An Argument drawn from the admitting Infants to the

Eucharist, as without which they could not be saved,

against the Church's Infallibility.

..355

V. An Argument drawn from the Doctrine of the Millenaries

against Infallibility

.....369

VI. A Letter relating to the same Subject

...380

VII. An Argument against the Infallibility of the present

Church of Rome, taken from the Contradictions in your

Doctrine of Transubstantiation

...382

VIII. An Account of what moved the Author to turn Papist,

with his own Confutation of the Arguments that persuaded

him thereto

....386

An Answer to some Passages in Rushworth's Dialogues....392

Against punishing Crimes with Death

...435