Martini Buceri Opera Latina

Przednia okładka
BRILL, 2000 - 224
Responding to Bishop Robert Ceneau, Sorbonnist, Bucer's subject-matter is twofold. Firstly, maintained is the compatibility of Reformation theology with Scripture, Patristic testimony, and the "saner Scholastics." Secondly, denying association with the heresy of Berengar, Bucer develops his perception of a common eucharistic theology among the Reformers, a theology Bucer finds corroborated in Scripture and Christian antiquity. After a plea for a fair hearing for the Reformation in France, Part I irenically surveys controverted dogmas and practices. Part II substantiates the thesis of fundamental harmony between Lutheran and Zwinglian eucharistic views. Part III rebuts Ceneau's polemical abuse. Republished as an "Appendix" is Bucer's contemporary memorandum on the viability of wider Church reunion. The tract reflects a significant transitional phase in Bucer's accommodation to both Catholic tradition and the Wittenberg sacramental theology.

Z wnętrza książki

Spis treści

Acknowledgements
vii
Introduction
xxiii
Bibliographical description
xxxix
TEXT
1
1
16
Cap 3
38
Cap 7
71
De ieiuniis
81
SECUNDA PARS
89
Defensio Zuinglii et Oecolampadii
95
Expositio nostrae doctrinae
105
An fides sine dilectione
137
Index of Names and Places
200
Index of Historical Allusions
210
Index of Select Terms
221
Prawa autorskie

Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko

Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia

Informacje o autorze (2000)

Ian Hazlett, educated at Belfast, St. Andrews, Strasbourg, and Munster (Dr. Theol. 1977), is Senior Lecturer in Ecclesiastical History at Glasgow University. Publications focus on Bucer, Calvin, Knox, Mary Stewart etc. and he has edited "Early Christianity" (SPCK, 1991).