S. Speldt v. Lechmere Sisters 324 326, 437 335 341, 344, 347, 430 377, 504 391 398 414 430, 445 477 389 502, 518 542 139, 168 153 Stringer v. Murray 154, 166, 207 170 Sutton v. Buck Shadforth v. Higgin Shields v. Davis Shield v. Davis Sanderson v. Busher 173 173, 227 204 210 211 223 237 240, 292 257 269 288 ib. 289 306 311 319, 453, 477 320 id. 324 325 343 345, 347 345, 346 346, 351, 437, 448 Sewell v. R. E. Company 348 Saville v. Campion 350, 467, 503 Shack v. Anthony 351, 438, 455, 479 380, 432 387, 480 395 Thompson v. Whitmore T. 99 163, 175 170, 198 Toulmin v. Anderson 195 212 243, 247 269 280 288 316 Thompson v. Wagner 332 Thomson v. Inglis 342 Touteng v. Hubbard 347, 357, 419 Toulmin v. Anderson 348 350, 481 Thomas v. Clarke 352 385 Trent and Mersey Navigation v. Wood 412 414 455, 460 465 480 490 Wills v. Osman Williams v. The East India Winter v. Trimmer Werldsborgaren, Lagerholm Ward v. Felton Walley v. Montgomery Wallace v. Breeds Whitehouse v. Frost Wright v. Campbell v. James William, Beckford White, Ford Wanstead Page 290 310 ib. 311, 315 311, 316 Y. Young v. Brander London Assurance Youl v, Harbottle Yates v. Railston v. Meynell 316 324 ib. 339, 455 348 375, 498 378 384 ib. 385 ib. 390 396, 460, 478 397 404 446 457 478 492 507, 508 508 511 ib. 514 518 523, 525 539 543 173, 195 223, 275 398 465, 466 467 INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION. NAVIGATION LAWS. to the law of Navigation. It will, perhaps, be readily admitted that, with the single Introduction exception of the soil, ships are the noblest property which Shipping and any country can possess, being machines of national defence as well as instruments of wealth to individuals. It is from these considerations that this species of property has always been taken under the special protection of the law; and adopted, not less as the means of naval power, than of commercial prosperity. The comparative greatness of the British Empire is not, indeed, imputable to one cause only. A very considerable portion of it belongs to a system of religion which, on the one hand, is reformed from the superstitions of the Romish church; whilst, on the other, it maintains all those essentials of doctrine which are adapted, beyond all others, to the happiness of individuals and nations. Another portion belongs to our laws and constitution, in the liberty and protection of which every man finds equal encouragement in acquiring, as security in possessing. Another portion belongs likewise to our national habits and character; and, perhaps, in no inconsiderable degree, to that hereditary opinion of superiority, with which the B Introduction meanest amongst us regards himself as a subject of the British empire. But the combined effect of all these causes is completed and crowned by our system of commerce; and more especially by those laws which regulate our trade and industry, with a view of rendering them concurrent instruments of our national power. It is as unnecessary to remind the living advocates of this system, as it would have been presumptuous to have reminded the illustrious founders of it, that the first principle of commerce is a perfect freedom of trade; that in almost all cases it should be left to make and find its own way and that the best boon which legislators can bestow upon it, is to leave it unrestrained. The framers of our Navigation System, and those who have so ably maintained their doctrines in the present day, have as large, and certainly as just a comprehension of the nature of commerce, as those who have risen up in opposition to their principles. But they thought, and if we may judge from the effect, they thought justly, that nations as well as individuals had other and greater interests than mere present wealth; that the first concerns of a great empire were its safety, its glory, and its national character; and that, in comparison with these pursuits, commercial wealth was, a subordinate object; or, at least, that it derived its best value as means to those more important ends. Under this consideration, they deemed it an enlarged prudence to tax our commerce for the sake of our public defence. They were aware that we might become richer under an unrestrained trade, than through a commerce however wisely regulated: but, as these regulations gave us a greater value in national defence than they subtracted from our immediate wealth, they conceived that they only sacrificed a less interest in pursuit of a greater. Hence our commerce has not been ignorantly yielded up to our navigation. Our Navigation System has not been adopted, as some have falsely asserted, as the means of advancing our commerce, but of maintaining and supplying the growth of our navy. And the effect has been what, to the Law of Navigation. " according to the experience of all nations, has always Introduction been the result of a large and generous prudence. Our Shipping and navy, which was at first supported at the expense of our trade, and, in fact, rose principally out of its restrictions, has now liberally paid back the aid which it borrowed: and by conquering so large a portion of the most fertile part of the globe into the sphere of our commerce, and by holding together the numerous members and remote dependencies of the British empire, has given us a market which mere commerce of itself could never have acquired. In this manner have our commercial greatness, and our naval power, become intermixed as reciprocal means and ends. Without our navy, in the present state of the world, and amidst the jealousy of so many rival nations, it would be absurd to indulge a momentary expectation that our commerce could either attain the eminence it possesses, or could long support itself in that superiority. And, without the sources of our commercial wealth, it would be manifestly impossible that the country could support the concurrent burthen of a great military and naval establishment. So impolitic must be every attempt to sever those interests, and so unwise every view which regards them as independent and adverse; because each is in a degree supported by a contribution from the other. Whatever limits a large expatiating principle is necessarily a subtraction from its immediate beneficial operation. But such principle is only adverse where it takes › more than it gives; where it imposes restrictions without any return of a greater, or at least equal good. But this is not the relation of our commerce and Navigation System. What it takes in restriction, it gives back in: protection. What it takes in increased freight, (if, indeed, the effect of our Navigation Law does increase our freight,) it repays by enlarging the sphere of the sup-ply of raw materials, and the market for manufactured goods; by opening India, China and America to our shipping, and by maintaining and superintending the |