from comparison with that of his illustrious opponent, David Hume. Next year, Beattie appeared in his true character as a poet. The first part of the Minstrel was published, and was received with universal approbation. Honours flowed in on the fortunate author. He visited London, and was admitted to all its brilliant and distinguished circles. Goldsmith, Johnson, Garrick, and Reynolds, were numbered among his friends. On a second visit in 1773, he had an interview with the king and queen, which resulted in a pension of £200 per annum. The University of Oxford conferred upon him the degree of LL.D., and Reynolds painted his portrait in an allegorical picture, in which Beattie was seen by the side of an angel pushing down Prejudice, Scepticism, and Folly! Need we wonder that poor Goldsmith was envious of his brother-poet? To the honour of Beattie, it must be recorded, that he declined entering the Church of England, in which preferment was promised him, and no doubt would have been readily granted. The second part of the Minstrel was published in 1774. Domestic circumstances marred the felicity of Beattie's otherwise happy and prosperous lot. His wife-the daughter of Dr Dun, Aberdeen-became insane, and was obliged to be confined in an asylum. He had two sons, both amiable and accomplished youths. The eldest lived till he was twenty-two, and was associated with his father in the professorship: he died in 1790, and the afflicted parent soothed his grief by writing his life, and publishing some specimens of his composition in prose and verse. The second son died in 1796, aged eighteen; and the only consolation of the now lonely poet was, that he could not have borne to see their 'elegant minds mangled with madness'-an allusion to the hereditary insanity of their mother. By nature, Beattie was a man of quick and tender sensibilities. A fine landscape, or music-in which he was a proficient -affected him even to tears. He had a sort of hysterical dread of meeting with his metaphysical opponents, which was an unmanly weakness. When he saw Garrick perform Macbeth, he had almost thrown himself, from nervous excitement, over the front of the two-shilling gallery; and he seriously contended for the grotesque mixture of tragedy and comedy in Shakspeare, as introduced by the great dramatist, to save the auditors from a disordered head or a broken heart!' This is 'parmaceti for an inward bruise' with a vengeance! He had, among his other idiosyncrasies, a morbid aversion to that cheerful household and rural sound, the crowing of a cock; and in his Minstrel he anathematises 'fell chanticleer' with burlesque fury: O to thy cursed scream, discordant still, Let harmony aye shut her gentle ear: Thy boastful mirth let jealous rivals spill, Insult thy crest, and glossy pinions tear, And ever in thy dreams the ruthless fox appear. Such an organisation, physical and moral, was ill fitted to insure happiness or fortitude in adversity. When his second son died, he said he had done with the world. He ceased to correspond with his friends, or to continue his studies. Shattered by a long train of nervous complaints, in April 1799 the poet had a stroke of palsy, and after different returns of the same malady, which excluded him from all society, he died on the 18th of August 1803. In the early training of his eldest and beloved son, Dr Beattie adopted an expedient of a romantic and interesting description. His object was to give him the first idea of a Supreme Being; and his method, as Dr Porteous, bishop of London, remarked, 'had all the imagination of Rousseau, without his folly and extravagance.' 'He had,' says Beattie, 'reached his fifth (or sixth) year, knew the alphabet, and could read a little; but had received no particular information with respect to the author of his being, because I thought he could not yet understand such information, and because I had learned, from my own experience, that to be made to repeat words not understood, is extremely detrimental to the faculties of a young mind. In a corner of a little garden, without informing any person of the circumstance, Í wrote in the mould, with my finger, the three initial letters of his name, and sowing garden cresses in the furrows, covered up the seed, and smoothed the ground. Ten days after, he came running to me, and with astonishment in his countenance, told me that his name was growing in the garden. I smiled at the report, and seemed inclined to disregard it; but he insisted on my going to see what had happened. "Yes," said I carelessly, on coming to the place; "I see it is so; but there is nothing in this worth notice; it is mere chance;" and I went away. He followed me, and taking hold of my coat, said with some earnestness: "It could not be mere chance, for that somebody must have contrived matters so as to produce it." I pretend not to give his words or my own, for I have forgotten both, but I give the substance of what passed between us in such language as we both understood. you think," I said, “that what appears so regular as the letters of your name cannot be by chance? "Yes," said he with firmness, "I think so." "Look at yourself," I replied, "and consider your hands and fingers, your legs and feet, and other limbs; are they not regular in their appearance, and useful to you?” He said they were. "Came you then hither," said I, "by chance?" "No," he answered; "that cannot be; something must have made me." "And who is that something?" I asked. He said he did not know. (I took particular notice that he did not say, as Rousseau fancies a child in like circumstances would say, that his parents made him.) I had now gained the point I aimed at; and saw that his reason taught him "So though he could not so express it-that what begins to be, must have a cause, and that what is formed with regularity, must have an intelligent cause. I therefore told him the name of the Great Being who made him and all the world, concerning whose adorable nature I gave him such information as I thought he could in some measure comprehend. The lesson affected him deeply, and he never forgot either it or the circumstance that introduced it.' The Minstrel, on which Beattie's fame now rests, is a didactic poem, in the Spenserian stanza, designed to trace the progress of a poetical genius, born in a rude age, from the first dawning of fancy and reason till that period at which he may be supposed capable of appearing in the world as a minstrel.' The idea was suggested by Percy's preliminary Dissertation to his Reliques-one other benefit which that collection has conferred upon the lovers of poetry. The character of Edwin, the minstrel-in which Beattie embodied his own early feelings and poetical aspirations-is very finely drawn. The romantic seclusion of his youth, and his ardour for knowledge, find a response in all young and generous minds; while the calm philosophy and reflection of the poet, interest the more mature and experienced reader. The poem was left unfinished, and this is scarcely to be regretted. Beattie had not strength of pinion to keep long on the wing in the same lofty region; and Edwin would have contracted some earthly taint in his descent. Gray thought there was too much description in the first part of the Minstrel, but who would exchange it for the philosophy of the second part? The poet intended to have carried his hero into a life of variety and action, but he certainly would not have succeeded. As it is, when he finds it necessary to continue Edwin beyond the 'flowery path' of childhood, and to explore the shades of life, he calls in the aid of a hermit, who schools the young enthusiast on virtue, knowledge, and the dignity of man. The appearance of this sage is happily described: At early dawn the youth his journey took, And, kneeling, licked the withered hand that tied [Opening of the Minstrel.] Ah! who can tell how hard it is to climb In life's low vale remote has pined alone, And yet the languor of inglorious days Him, who ne'er listened to the voice of praise, Health, competence, and peace. Nor higher aim Had he, whose simple tale these artless lines proclaim. The rolls of fame I will not now explore; Nor need I here describe, in learned lay, How forth the Minstrel fared in days of yore, Right glad of heart, though homely in array; His waving locks and beard all hoary gray; While from his bending shoulder, decent hung His harp, the sole companion of his way, Which to the whistling wind responsive rung: And ever as he went some merry lay he sung. Fret not thyself, thou glittering child of pride, That a poor villager inspires my strain; With thee let Pageantry and Power abide; The gentle Muses haunt the sylvan reign; Where through wild groves at eve the lonely swain Enraptured roams, to gaze on Nature's charms. They hate the sensual, and scorn the vain; The parasite their influence never warms, Nor him whose sordid soul the love of gold alarms. Though richest hues the peacock's plumes adorn, Yet horror screams from his discordant throat. Rise, sons of harmony, and hail the morn, While warbling larks on russet pinions float: Or seek at noon the woodland scene remote, Where the gray linnets carol from the hill, O let them ne'er, with artificial note, To please a tyrant, strain the little bill, But sing what Heaven inspires, and wander where they will. Liberal, not lavish, is kind Nature's hand; Nor was perfection made for man below. Yet all her schemes with nicest art are planned, Good counteracting ill, and gladness woe. With gold and gems if Chilian mountains glow, If bleak and barren Scotia's hills arise; There plague and poison, lust and rapine grow; Here peaceful are the vales, and pure the skies, And freedom fires the soul, and sparkles in the eyes. Then grieve not thou, to whom the indulgent Muse Vouchsafes a portion of celestial fire: Nor blame the partial Fates, if they refuse O how canst thou renounce the boundless store O how canst thou renounce, and hope to be forgiven? There lived in Gothic days, as legends tell, A shepherd swain, a man of low degree, But he, I ween, was of the north countrie; The shepherd swain of whom I mention made, [Description of Edwin.] And yet poor Edwin was no vulgar boy. And now he laughed aloud, yet none knew why. But why should I his childish feats display? Or roamed at large the lonely mountain's head, Or where the maze of some bewildered stream To deep untrodden groves his footsteps led, There would he wander wild, till Phoebus' beam, Shot from the western cliff, released the weary team. The exploit of strength, dexterity, or speed, His heart, from cruel sport estranged, would bleed By trap or net, by arrow or by sling; And sure the sylvan reign unbloody joy might yield. Lo! where the stripling, wrapt in wonder, roves And oft he traced the uplands to survey, But, lo! the sun appears, and heaven, earth, ocean, smile. Responsive to the sprightly pipe, when all In sprightly dance the village youth were joined, To the pure soul by Fancy's fire refined, When with the charm compared of heavenly melancholy! Is there a heart that music cannot melt? Is there, who ne'er those mystic transports felt He needs not woo the Muse; he is her scorn. The sophist's rope of cobweb he shall twine; Mope o'er the schoolman's peevish rage; or mourn, And delve for life in Mammon's dirty mine; Sneak with the scoundrel fox, or grunt with glutton swine. For Edwin, Fate a nobler doom had planned; For this of time and culture is the fruit; Meanwhile, whate'er of beautiful or new, Sublime, or dreadful, in earth, sea, or sky, By chance, or search, was offered to his view, He scanned with curious and romantic eye. Whate'er of lore tradition could supply From Gothic tale, or song, or fable old, Roused him, still keen to listen and to pry. At last, though long by penury controlled, And solitude, his soul her graces 'gan unfold. Thus on the chill Lapponian's dreary land, Pure rills through vales of verdure warbling go; And wonder, love, and joy the peasant's heart o'erflow. [Morning Landscape.] Even now his eyes with smiles of rapture glow, As on he wanders through the scenes of morn, Where the fresh flowers in living lustre blow, Where thousand pearls the dewy lawns adorn, A thousand notes of joy in every breeze are borne. But who the melodies of morn can tell? The wild brook babbling down the mountain side; The lowing herd; the sheepfold's simple bell; The pipe of early shepherd dim descried In the lone valley; echoing far and wide The clamorous horn along the cliffs above; The hollow murmur of the ocean-tide; The hum of bees, the linnet's lay of love, And the full choir that wakes the universal grove. The cottage-curs at early pilgrim bark; Crowned with her pail the tripping milkmaid sings; The whistling ploughman stalks afield; and, hark! Down the rough slope the ponderous wagon rings; Through rustling corn the hare astonished springs; Slow tolls the village-clock the drowsy hour; The partridge bursts away on whirring wings; Deep mourns the turtle in sequestered bower, And shrill lark carols clear from her aërial tower. [Life and Immortality.] O ye wild groves, O where is now your bloom !— The Muse interprets thus his tender thoughtYour flowers, your verdure, and your balmy gloom, Of late so grateful in the hour of drought? Why do the birds, that song and rapture brought To all your bowers, their mansions now forsake? Ah! why has fickle chance this ruin wrought? For now the storm howls mournful through the brake, And the dead foliage flies in many a shapeless flake. Where now the rill, melodious, pure, and cool, Fled each fair form, and mute each melting sound, Yet such the destiny of all on earth: Borne on the swift, though silent wings of Time, Old age comes on apace to ravage all the clime. And be it so. Let those deplore their doom And Spring shall soon her vital influence shed, Again attune the grove, again adorn the mead. Shall I be left forgotten in the dust, Bright through the eternal year of Love's triumphant reign. Retirement.-1758. When in the crimson cloud of even The lingering light decays, And Hesper on the front of heaven His glittering gem displays; Deep in the silent vale, unseen, A pensive youth, of placid mien, 'Ye cliffs, in hoary grandeur piled High o'er the glimmering dale; Ye woods, along whose windings wild Murmurs the solemn gale: 'Thy shades, thy silence now be mine, Thy charms my only theme; My haunt the hollow cliff, whose pine 'Oh, while to thee the woodland pours Its wildly warbling song, And balmy from the bank of flowers Let no rude sound invade from far, No ray from Grandeur's gilded car 'But if some pilgrim through the glade Thy hallowed bowers explore, O guard from harm his hoary head, For he of joys divine shall tell, And triumph o'er the mighty spell 'For me, no more the path invites Ambition loves to tread; No more I climb those toilsome heights, By guileful Hope misled; Leaps my fond fluttering heart no more To Mirth's enlivening strain; For present pleasure soon is o'er, The Hermit. At the close of the day, when the hamlet is still, 'Ah! why, all abandoned to darkness and woe, 'Now gliding remote on the verge of the sky, "Tis night, and the landscape is lovely no more; "Twas thus, by the glare of false science betrayed, contemporary Gray prophesied truly that the result of his conduct would be a jail or bedlam. In 1747, he wrote a comedy called a Trip to Cambridge, or The Grateful Fair, which was acted in Pembroke College Hall, the parlour of which was made the green-room. No remains of this play have been found, excepting a few songs and a mock-heroic soliloquy, the latter containing the following humorous simile: Thus when a barber and a collier fight, The barber beats the luckless collier white; 'He Having written several pieces for periodicals published by Newberry, Smart became acquainted with the bookseller's family, and married his stepdaughter, Miss Carnan, in the year 1753. He now removed to London, and endeavoured to subsist by his pen. The notorious Sir John Hill-whose wars with the Royal Society, with Fielding, &c., are well known, and who closed his life by becoming a quack-doctor-having insidiously attacked Smart, the latter replied by a spirited satire, entitled The Hilliad. Among his various tasks was a metrical translation of the Fables of Phædrus. He also translated the psalms and parables into verse, but the version is destitute of talent. He had, however, in his better days, translated with success, and to Pope's satisfaction, the Ode on St Cecilia's Day.' In 1756, Smart was one of the conductors of a monthly periodical called The Universal Visitor; and to assist him, Johnson-who sincerely sympathised, as Boswell relates, with Smart's unhappy vacillation of mind-contributed a few essays. In 1763, we find the poor poet confined in a madhouse. has partly as much exercise,' said Johnson, as he used to have, for he digs in the garden. Indeed, before his confinement, he used for exercise to walk to the ale-house; but he was carried back again. I did not think he ought to be shut up. His infirmities were not noxious to society. He insisted on people praying with him-also falling upon his knees and saying his prayers in the street, or in any other unusual place; and I'd as lief pray with Kit Smart as any one else. Another charge was, that he did not love clean linen; and I have no passion for it.' During his confinement, it is said, writing materials were denied him, and Smart used to indent his poetical thoughts with a key on the wainscot of his walls. A religious poem, the Song to David, written at this time in his saner intervals, possesses passages of considerable power, and must be considered one of the greatest curiosities of our literature. What the unfortunate poet did not write down-and the whole could not possibly have been committed to the walls of his CHRISTOPHER SMART, an unfortunate and irregular apartment-must have been composed and retained man of genius, was born in 1722 at Shipbourne, in from memory alone. Smart was afterwards released Kent. His father was steward to Lord Barnard-from his confinement; but his ill-fortune-following, afterwards Earl of Darlington-and dying when we suppose, his intemperate habits-again pursued his son was eleven years of age, the patronage of him. He was committed to the King's Bench Lord Barnard was generously continued to his prison for debt, and died there, after a short illness, family. Through the influence of this nobleman, in 1770. The following is part of his Destruction before me, and sorrow behind. 'And darkness and doubt are now flying away, And beauty immortal awakes from the tomb.' CHRISTOPHER SMART. Christopher procured from the Duchess of Cleveland an allowance of £40 per annum. He was admitted of Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, in 1739, elected a fellow of Pembroke in 1745, and took his degree of M.A. in 1747. At college, Smart was remarkable for folly and extravagance, and his distinguished Song to David. O thou, that sit'st upon a throne, |