CHAP. VI.

The words Church, Church of Chrift, Catholick Church, often used to fignify a part of the Univerfal Church,

p. 113

The Church of Rome may perish, and yet the Ca-
tholick Church be preferved,
By the word CHURCH to be underflood the Faith,
Worship, and Polity of the Church,

p. 120

p. 130

CHAP. VII.

Dr. Hickes's farther Vindication of his Anfwer to the Miffioner's Challenge, Name your Bishops, Writers, &c. 900 or 1000 Years before the Separation, p. 135 The difference fhewn between a Church morally and metaphyfically True, p. 139 Idolatrous Worship proved upon the Roman Church,

P. 145

The Sin of Idolatry does not deftroy the Being of a Chriftian,

p. 147

An Idolatrous Church may become a pure and mo rally Holy Church upon Repentance and Refor

mation,

p. 150

The Doctor's Charity for the Church of Rome,

p. 152

CHA P. VIII.

The Church of Rome no Vifible Church of Chrift, i. e. of faithful Men, where the Sacraments are duly adminiftred. Allow'd to be a Real (though an Impure) Church,

p. 152

P. 160

The

The Church of England no new (but a renew'd and reform'd) Religion,

p. 16r

CHA P. IX.

The promife of Indefectibility falfly arrogated to
the Roman Church,
p. 163
Several other Churches have vifibly continu'd (tho
conti
not always flourished) from their Foundation to
this prefent day,
p.. 170
Our Ancestors 900 Years ago had no fuch occafion
as we, to protest against Popish Innovations,
p. 171
Our Faith the fame it was 900 or 1000 Years
before Luther,
ibid.
The Council of Trent a pack'd Council, neither Free
nor General,
P...172
The Church of England defended from the Charge
of Herefy,
Multitude no Argument for Univerfality in the Ro-
man Church,
p. 180
Chrift the only Head, under which the whole Body
of the Catholick Church is united,

P. 174, 175

p. 182

CHA P. X.

The Doctor's repeated Challenge to the Miffioner's
to fhew the Antiquity, Univerfality, and Suc-
ceffion for the Trent Do&rines during the firft
five or fix Centuries.
p. 188, 189

Some Letters which passed between the Miffioner and Dr. Hickes, before the Doctor fent bim an Answer to his Reply,

p. 197

The Miffioner's Letter with this Query, By what
Linage do you make your Defcent good from

the

the 4th Century to the pretended Refotina

tion.

ibid.

The Doctor's Anfwer,

p. 198

The Query turn'd upon the Miffioner,
The Miffioner's Reply to the Doctor's Answer,

p. 200

P. 204 The Character of COCCIUS, to whom he refers the Dodor, in the Margin, The Anfwer written to the Miffioner's Reply by one of the Doctor's Friends, p. 211

p. 208

A Letter of Monfieur de Meaux to Robert Nelfon, Efq; in French,

Tranflated into English,

p. 227 p. 229

Dr. Bull's Anfwer to that Letter,

Sect. I. p. 232 The Roman Church and the Catholick Church not convertible Terms, p. 233 The great danger of their Salvation, who live in Communion with the Church of Rome, p. 234 The infallible affiftance of the Holy Ghost in the Council of Nice, or any other truly General Council, no Argument for Communion with the Church of Rome, P. 235 The Doctor's Anfwer to the Bishop's Question, What is meant by the Catholick Church? p. 237 The Corruptions of the Church of Rome detected,

Sect. II.

In Government,

In the Rule of Faith,

166

p. 239 Sect. III, p. 243

The Reverend Mr. Leflie's Anfwer to the aforefaid Bishop's Letter.

What is to be meant by the Catholick Church, p. 303

The Government of the Church committed to Bifhops, who were distinguished by the Titles of Diocefan

Diocefan Bishops, Metropolitans, Primates, and Patriarchs,

p. 304

From whence the Council of Bishops in the Empire were filed Oecumenical, p. 305

The Patriarch of Conftantinople claimed the Primacy upon the Seat of the Empire's being tranflated thither from Rome, ibid. An Univerfal Primacy difclaimed and protested against by Pope Gregory the Great, Bishop of Rome, p. 306 The Pope's Supremacy limited by the Gallican Church, p. 306, 307 That limitation disputed, p. 307 Reafon for difowning the Pope's Supremacy, ibid.

The fame Reafons might be urged for an Univerfal Monarch, as for an Univerfal Bishop,

p. 312

His Anfwer to the Bishop's Queflion, How feveral Churches can be that Kingdom of Chrift not divided in it felf, and which can never fail?

P. 313, 314

p. 321

The Schifm of fuch as have broke off from fubjection to their lawful Bishops, juftly charged upon the Pope's pretended Sovereignty, p. 318 Every Bishop in his own Diocefs may condemn an Herefy, but no Council of Bishops can alter any Fundamental Article of Faith, The Dispute not yet determined where the Infalli bility is placed, p. 322 A Letter to an English Priest of the Roman Com munion at Rome, from Robert Nelfon, Efq; His Opinion of a pretended Miracle, P. 325 Infallibility has no foundation either in Holy Scrip

ture or primitive Antiquity,

P. 327, 328

The

The Holy Scriptures and Fathers afperfed by fome of the Romish Writers,

p. 330

APPENDIX.

Mr. Herbert Thorndike's Fudgment of the Church of Rome,

Paper I.

Mr. Chillingworth's Letter of the Infallibitity of
the Church of Rome,
Paper II.
The Creed of Pope Pius IV.
Paper III.
Bp. Cofin's Letter to the late Countess of Peter-
borough, concerning the difference in the chief
points of Religion between the Church of Rome
and the Church of England,
Pap. IV.
A publick Office of daily Devotion for the Seven
canonical Hours used in the time of the Saxons,
with a Tranflation and Notes of the Reverend
Mr. Elftob.

ERRATA.

Page

Age 67. Line 26. read in quo libro (proh dolor!) p.ibid. 1. 28. r. Maximè p. 81. l. 1. dele in. p. 140. 1. 6. dele be. p. 182. l. 15. r. those. p. 253. 1. 2. r. brief. p. 256. 1. 20. r. to. p. 270. Marg. I. penult. r. ab eodem imperatore Romam eft. p. 274. Marg. I. 9.r. cultúque p. 318. l. 25. r. Dei.

L