Obrazy na stronie
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Ruckman-Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v.
Saunders v. Link.

Saville, Clerk, v. Virginia Railway & Power Co..

Savings Bank of Richmond v. Todd, Trustee.

Schmelz,-Commonwealth v.

Scott v. James, Secretary &c...

Senseny's Admr. v. Boyd's Admr.

Settle, Ex Parte.

[blocks in formation]

259

126

297

598

395

158

248

570

73

358

671, 672

Smith-Eggborn v. .

Smith-Miller's Trustees v.

Smith v. Stanley.

655

561

99

Smithfield Marl, Clay &c. Co.-Water Front Coal

[blocks in formation]

Southern Railway Co.-Clayville Mfg. Co. v.

420

134

356

146

201

536

98

99

Starks-Honaker Admr. v..

State Female Normal School-Burger v..

Sutherland-Clinchfield Coal Company v..

[blocks in formation]

Third National Bank-Pennington, Receiver, v.

510

Thorp Carter v. . .

347

Tisdale v. Commonwealth.

473

Todd, Trustee-Savings Bank of Richmond v...

598

Tucker-Penn v.

Tyree's Admr.-Southern Railway Co. v..

United States Express Co. v. City of Portsmouth. .

589

146

477

Vinton-Roanoke Water Co.-Jeter v..

400

[blocks in formation]

Virginia Railway & Power Co.-Saville, Clerk, v..

297

Walter & Walter-Culpeper National Bank v..

613

Water Front Coal Co., Inc. v. Smithfield Marl &c.

[blocks in formation]

THE EARLIEST REPORT OF ALL CURRENT DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS.

VOL. VII.

SEPTEMBER 21, 1912.

No. 1

Tri-monthly during months beginning 15th of each January, March, June, September and November.

M. B. WATTS,

Editor and Publisher

NOTICE. Subscriptions must be renewed upon notice of expiration or mailing to that address will be discontinued.

Subscribers who fail to receive any number must notify us within two weeks after date of issue of the number not received. After the expiration of two weeks copies ordered must be paid for at published prices.

RULE XVII.

REHEARING.

No application for a rehearing will be entertained unless made within ten days after the decision is announced (except as otherwise authorized by law), and no rehearing will be allowed unless one of the judges who concurred in the decision shall be dissatisfied with it and desires a rehearing. And an application under the Code, Chapter 170, sec. 3492, to rehear and review any case decided by this court within the last fifteen days of the preceding term shall be made within the first fifteen days of the next succeeding term, and not thereafter. And no application for a rehearing will be entertained by the court in any case, unless the reasons therefor, printed, shall be filed at the time such application is made.

N. B. All opinions printed in this number are subject to rehearings which may be granted under the above rule. Petitions for rehearings filed, and the action of the court thereon, will be noted on this page of each number.

Rehearings refused in

Smith, Treasurer, v. Bell.

Washington-Virginia Ry. Co. v. Bouknight.
American Locomotive Co. v. Chalkley.
Bowe et als v. Scott et als.

Rehearing granted and opinion amended in

Jackson Coal & Coke Co. v. Phillips Line.

Petitions for rehearings pending in

United States v. Wm. R. Trigg Co.

Virginia Beach Development Co. v. Murray.

« PoprzedniaDalej »