Obrazy na stronie
PDF
ePub

there should be none or but very little, nor should that transcend the colloquial style.

That part of a discourse devoted to narration, as in pleadings at the bar; or to explication, as in most sermons, has more of action, as it has more of earnestness; and more freedom of gesture, as the feeling of modesty on the part of the speaker becomes absorbed in the interest of his subject. In this, therefore, as also in the argumentative parts of a discourse, the colloquial style of gesture will often yield to the rhetorical; and the interest of the speaker, as he approaches the conclusion of an argument, or the climax of his successive trains of thought, will exhibit itself in a freer movement of the arm, and a louder tone of voice.

The force and chief ornaments of gesture will be reserved by the judicious speaker for those parts of his discourse for which he reserves the brilliancy of language and of thought; that is, for those parts which are intended to appeal to the feelings of his audience. On these parts alone can the orator's powers be fully exhibited; nor should any attempt be made to protract the pathetic or exciting parts of a discourse to any great length. Just so long, however, as the voice and the language are in consonance with these warm emotions, should the gesture remain free and unconstrained; and till we find the place from which boldness and magnificence of language are excluded, there will be no occasion to exclude even the epic style of gesture. The proper occasions for its employment, however, are rare, and from the nature of the case must be of short continuance.

In passing, it may be remarked, that every part of an oration or other discourse may have its digressions; and these, it is obvious, are to be pronounced with a voice and gesture suited to their spirit, even though gesture be wholly suspended by their recurrence. These, then, should but

rarely, perhaps never, occur in those parts which are addressed to the passions. These interruptions turn aside the current of feeling, and give the subject of the emotion time to rally his powers of resistance.

Of the conclusion, it may be sufficient to say, that the gestures should correspond with its spirit-its matter, and the feeling with which it is pronounced. It may, or may not, be accompanied with gesture; and when it is, the gesture may be more or less bold and free.—The final adjustment of the hands to rest, at the close either of a paragraph or a discourse, is most graceful, when immediately preceded by a gesture of the right hand alone; and that, some other than a cross gesture. The gesture of both hands, or even the cross gesture of the right, should then be avoided as a concluding gesture.

APPENDIX.

CHAPTER IV.

HINTS ON THE ELOCUTION ADAPTED TO THE PULPIT.

He who supposes that Elocution is to be studied for the express purpose of producing a variety in the vocal movements, and an amount of action in speaking, proportioned to the profusion with which nature has furnished the elements of expression, has mistaken its object. The study of Elocution has for its object to improve the taste and correct the judgment as regards the extent to which intonation and gesture shall be carried, and also as to the kind to be employed, as well as to furnish the materials from which to make the selection. The principles of Elocution are as necessary to teach one when to abstain from the vocal expression of excited feeling and from action, as when to use them; and as necessary to direct him who uses the least of oratorical expression, as him who uses the most. "This art," says some one, speaking particularly of gesture, "may serve the same excellent purpose to the awkward gesticulator, for which the father sent his clownish son to the dancing school, that he might learn to stand still."

The just elocution of the pulpit, however, is as far removed from a state of perfect inaction, as from the passionate and diversified action of the theatre. The latter, all unite in condemning as unsuited to the true dignity of the pulpit; while the former also is equally condemned by all

[blocks in formation]

sensible men. Addison deemed it a just cause of complaint, that the preachers of his time stood stock still in the pulpit, and would not so much as move a finger to set off the best sermon in the world ;" at the same time that he remarks on the "smooth continued stream" in which their words flowed, and the "insipid serenity" of countenance of their orators generally. Sheridan repeats the same charge against the pulpit in particular; and says that on this account, "the greater part of the members of the English church are either banished from their places of worship through disgust, or reluctantly attend the service as a disagreeable duty." There must be an Elocution, then, which is adapted to the pulpit,-which so harmonizes with the place and with the subjects usually treated there, as to please and gratify the eye, at the same time that the ear is delighted with the melody of a well-trained voice. To adopt the language of an old English divine,-"I imagine, that through the regulations of taste, the improvements of experience, the corrections of friendship, the feelings of piety, and the gradual mellowings of time,—such an elocution may be acquired as is above delineated; and such as when acquired will make its way to the hearts of the hearers, through their ears and eyes, with a delight to both that is seldom felt; whilst, contrary to what is commonly practiced, it will appear to the former the very language of nature, and present to the latter the lively image of the preacher's soul." And with this same writer I will add, "Were a taste for this kind of elocution to take place, it is difficult to say how much the preaching art would gain by it."

The PULPIT furnishes the best field for a powerful oratory, that the world has ever seen. The themes it presents for discussion are sufficiently various, and all of them involving

interests of the very highest moment-the interests not of small portions of the audiences addressed, but "the universal and most important interests of mankind! far beyond those for which the thunder of Demosthenes rolled in Athens-far beyond those for which Cicero shook the senate-house in Rome." The pulpit orator also enjoys a freedom of selecting and adapting his subjects to the case in hand, and to his own taste and powers, which is scarcely found elsewhere; and these are such as to raise him above the charge either of weakness or affectation, however warm and ardent may be his appeals. Every one knows that for him not to feel-would of itself prove him unfit for the place he occupies. In proof of the inspiration connected with the pulpit, many of the sermons which have been preserved, in Latin, in English, and in French, are enriched with all the taste of classic elegance; and as specimens of written eloquence, have scarcely been surpassed or even equaled. It is fortunate for the church and the world, as well as for the cause we advocate, that there have also been in the church those who were masters of all the arts of oral eloquence, from the Patriarch of Constantinople,* who was himself the pupil of the most celebrated rhetorician of his time, down through every age of prosperity in the church, even to the present day. The perfect union of the chaste style of many of the English divines with an action which shall give to him who effects it a disinction equaled only by his usefulness, is an object which may well excite the emulation of some of the many young men of our country, who, called by God to the sacred.

* He has been called the Homer of orators, and was surnamed Cnrysostom, which signifies golden mouth, on account of his eloquence.

« PoprzedniaDalej »