Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1969 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U.S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
actual reduction Aeronautics and Space affidavit appellant's appellants appellee application for patent astigmatism basis Board of Appeals Brenner Brossi CCPA chemical cited claimed compound claims 21 clearly erroneous Commissioner of Patents comparative tests conception conclusion considered Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision deposit device disclosed disclosure District Court District of Columbia Ex parte Kropp examiners-in-chief fact filing date foreign application Graham Henze interference proceeding invention inventor involved issue fee John Deere John Deere Co Kluver known and available Kordowski Ladd Lassman lens microorganism Mortsell National Aeronautics non-obviousness Odierno opinion party Patent Appeals patent application Patent Office person skilled petitioners preliminary statement prior art priority question reduction to practice rejection requirements rule satellite section 103 Space Act specification statute statutory stock culture collection structural obviousness subject matter sufficiency of disclosure surface of revolution Syncom testimony tion United States Patent unobvious USPQ utility written description Zenith Radio Corp
Popularne fragmenty
Strona 11 - Agency action made reviewable by statute and final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court are subject to judicial review.
Strona 95 - Under § 103, the scope and content of the prior art are to be determined; differences between the prior art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained; and the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art resolved.
Strona 128 - An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.
Strona 100 - But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application of the original thought, a change only in form, proportions or degree, the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent.
Strona 13 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Strona 31 - Made" — when used in relation to any invention or discovery means the conception or first actual reduction to practice of such invention in the course of or under the contract.
Strona 148 - Moreover, Congress may not authorize the issuance of patents whose effects are to remove existent knowledge from the public domain, or to restrict free access to materials already available. Innovation, advancement, and things which add to the sum of useful knowledge are inherent requisites in a patent system which by constitutional command must "promote the Progress of ... useful Arts.
Strona 102 - clearly erroneous" when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.
Strona 131 - Each appeal shall be heard by at least three members of the Board of Appeals, the members hearing such appeal to be designated by the Commissioner. The Board of Appeals has sole power to grant rehearings.
Strona 153 - The burden is on the applicant to rebut that presumption [of unpatentaability] by a showing that the claimed compound possesses unobvious or unexpected beneficial properties not actually possessed by the prior art homologue. It is immaterial that the prior art homologue...