Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports, Tom 50Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, 1963 |
Inne wydania - Wyświetl wszystko
Kluczowe wyrazy i wyrażenia
47 CCPA acetylene acid affidavit affirming the examiner's ALMOND apparatus APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's appellee appellee's applicant's Associate Judges Board of Appeals carbon CCPA chemical Chief Judge cited claimed compounds Clarence W coil Commissioner of Patents composition comprising considered copolymer counsel count Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision defined delivered the opinion disclosed disclosure Emphasis examiner examiner's rejection fact filing date function invention issue Lanham Act limitation liquid mark MARTIN material means metal method methyl isothiocyanate mold obvious Oral argument ordinary skill oxide panels parent application Patent Appeals Patent Office polymer portion position prior art reaction reasons of appeal recited record reduction to practice reference registration rejection of claims relied res judicata Serial slats SMITH space velocity specification stringers structure substantially teaching temperature therein thereof tion tube United States Court unobvious unpatentable USPQ WORLEY
Popularne fragmenty
Strona 976 - trade-mark" includes any word, name, symbol, or device or any combination thereof adopted and used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify his goods and distinguish them from those manufactured or sold by others.
Strona 806 - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
Strona 1470 - The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Strona 1111 - ... hindsight" from appellant's disclosure. The teachings of the prior art cited and relied on in combination are convincing that appellant's claimed invention would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made.
Strona 793 - ... a full list of the articles used as components of such drug; (c) a full statement of the composition of such drug; (d) a full description of the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, and packing of such drug...
Strona 927 - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
Strona 1577 - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue, or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.
Strona 793 - ... (A) the investigations, reports of which are required to be submitted to the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b), do not include adequate tests by all methods reasonably applicable to show whether or not such drug is safe for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the proposed labeling...
Strona 865 - The court, on petition, shall hear and determine such appeal, and revise the decision appealed from in a summary way, on the evidence produced before the Commissioner, at such early and convenient time as the court may Statement of the Case. appoint ; and the revision shall be confined to the points set forth in the reasons of appeal.
Strona 873 - The Federal Rules reject the approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of pleading is to facilitate a proper decision on the merits.