« PoprzedniaDalej »
SECOND SERIES OF THE CONTROVERSIAL DISCOURSES.
THE ENTANGLEMENT INCREASING:
I. Eliphaz and Job: XV-XVII.
1. Recital in the way of rebuke of all in Job's discourses that is perverted, and that bears testi. mony against his innocence :
CHAPTER XV. 1-19. 1 Then answered Eliphaz the Temanite, and said, 2 Should a wise man utter vain knowledge,
and fill his belly with the East wind ? 3 Should he reason with unprofitable talk ?
or with speeches wherewith he can do no good ? 4 Yea, thou castest off fear,
and restrainest prayer before God. 5 For thy mouth uttereth thine iniquity,
and thou choosest the tongue of the crafty. 6 Thine own mouth condemneth thee, and not I:
yea, thine own lips testify against thee. 7 Art thou the first man that was born ?
or wast thou made before the hills ? 8 Hast thou heard the secret of God ?
and dost thou restrain wisdom to thyself? 9 What knowest thou that we know not?
what understandest thou, which is not in us ? 10 With us are both the gray-headed and very aged men,
much elder than thy father. 11 Are the consolations of God small with thee?
is there any secret thing with thee? 12 Why doth thine heart carry thee away,
and what do thy eyes wink at, 13 that thou turnest thy spirit against God,
and lettest such words go out of thy mouth? 14 What is man, that he should be clean?
and he which is born of a woman, that he should be righteous ? 15 Behold He putteth no trust in His saints ;
yea, the heavens are not clean in His sight. 16 How much more abominable and filthy is man,
which drinketh iniquity like water? 17 I will show thee, hear me ;
and that which I have seen I will declare ; 18 which wise men have told
from their fathers-and have not hid it: 19 unto whom alone the earth was given,
and no stranger passed among them.
2. A didactic admonition on the subject of the retributive justice of God in the destiny of the ungodly.
VERSES 20–35. 20 The wicked man travaileth with pain all his days,
and the number of years is hidden to the oppressor. 21 A dreadful sound is in his ears :
in prosperity the destroyer shall come upon him. 22 He believeth not that he shall return out of darkness,
and he is waited for of the sword. 23 He wandereth abroad for bread, saying, Where is it?
he knoweth that the day of darkness is ready at his hand. 24 Trouble and anguish shall make him afraid ;
they shall prevail against him as a king ready to the battle. 25 For he stretcheth out his hand against God,
and strengtheneth himself against the Almighty: 26 he runneth upon him, even on his neck,
upon the thick bosses of his bucklers ; 27 because he covereth his face with his fatness,
and maketh collops of fat on his flanks: 28 and he dwelleth in desolate cities,
and in houses which no man inhabiteth,
which are ready to become heaps. 29 He shall not be rich, neither shall his substance continue,
neither shall be prolong the perfection thereof upon the earth. 30 He shall not depart out of darkness ;
the flame shall dry up his branches,
and by the breath of his mouth shall he go away. 31 Let not him that is deceived trust in vanity,
for vanity shall be his recompense. 32 It shall be accomplished before his time,
and his branch shall not be green. 33 He shall shake off his unripe grape as the vine,
and shall cast off his flower as the olive. 34 For the congregation of hypocrites shall be desolate,
and fire shall consume the tabernacles of bribery. 35 They conceive mischief, and bring forth vanity, and their belly prepareth deceit.
destiny of the ungodly, as an example repeating
itself in accordance with God's righteous decree, EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL.
and full of warning for Job. The first division This second discourse of Eliphaz is again the comprises three strophes of five verses each, tolongest of the atracks made on Job by bis three gether with a shorter group of three verses (vers. opponents in this second series or act. Not only 17-19), which forms the transition to the followby its length, but also by its confident, impas. ing division. The latter consists of three strosioned tone, it gives evidence of being a deliver- phes, of which the middle one numbers six ance of opinion by the oldest and most distin- verses, the first and last each five. guished of the three, in short by their leader. 2. First Division: Censuring the perversity of Apart from certain indications of increased vio- Job in his discourses, and pointing out the evilence, however, it adds nothing at all that is new dences which they gave of his guilt; vers. 2-19. to that which had been previously maintained hy First Strophe : Introduction (Job's discourses Eliphaz against Job. Its first principal division disprove his wisdom, injure religion, and testify (vers. 2-19) subjects that which was erroneous against himself ] vers. 2-6. in Job's discourses to the same rigid criticism Ver. 2. Doth a wise man utter (or, anand censure, which culminates in a renewed and swer with] windy knowledge ?- Eliphaz more emphatic application to Job of the doctrine begins each one of his three discourses with a advocated in the former discourse, of the impu- question]. Job bad clearly enough set himself rity of all before God (vers. 14-19; comp. ch. forth as a Wise Man, ch. xii. 3 ; xiii. 2. Hence iv. 17 seq.). The second division (vers. 20-35) this ironical contrast between this self-praise is occupied with a prolonged dissertation on the land the “windy” nature (comp. ch. viii. 2; xvi.
3) of that which he really knew. And fill his most vital points.-E.). In regard to the form breast [sein Inneres, his inward parts) with n'v [with feminine ending] see ch. iii. 4. the stormy East wind?-So Delitzsch, whose translation is to be preferred on the score of PH, detrahere, to derogate from, to prejudice taste to the more common and literal version: [Fürst: to weaken, to lessen); comp. below ver. " and fill his belly with the East wind ?” even if 8, where it conveys more the sense of " drawing we grant that fo is not, without further quali- to one's-self” [reserving, attrahere), and ch.
xxxvi. 7, where it means withdrawing.” fication, synonymous with 35, and consequently
Ver. 5. For thy transgression teaches not to be taken as a mere designation of the thy mouth: i. e., thou allowest thyself to be “thinking inner part” of man (altbough in fa- wholly influenced in what thou sayest by thy vor of this application of it, as maintained by sin, thou showest thyself, even in thy words, io Delitzsch, we might cite, if not ver. 35 of this be entirely ruled by it. So correctly the Vulg., chapter, at least ch. xxxii. 18 seq.). In any case Raschi, Luther, Dillm. [Ewald, Schlottm.), for D' “ East wind,” is here (as well as in Hos. the probability is in favor of pply, which stands xii. 2  a stronger synonym of min, “wind,” first, being the subject of the sentence. Moreand so describes the violence, or the ceaseless over, the rendering which has latterly become noisy bluster and roar of Job's discourses; and current (since Rosenm., Umbreit, Hirzel, etc.): belly, or the inward part, which must
“thy mouth teaches, i. e., exposes [E. V.‘uttertake into itself such discourses and labor for eth'] thine iniquity,” is at variance with the their refutation, appears as though it were a sail, usual sense of 72, which signifies “ to teach, or tent-canvas inflated by a heavy storm!
to instruct,” not "to show, to declare.” [To Ver. 3. An explanatory clause subordinate to which Schlottmann adds that this rendering sethe preceding interrogative clause:-Arguing cures a better connection between the first and with speech which availeth nought, and second members of the verse. It exbibits to us with words by which one can do no good. “ in a manner alike original and suitable, the -The Inf. Absol. ngin can be taken neither as internal motive from which Job's presumptuous an interrogative finite verb (Hirzel, Renan: se and still crafty discourses proceed ”].-And defend il-par des vaines paroles ? [" for though the thou choosest the speech (lit. the tongue) Inf. Absol. is so used in a historical clause (ch. of the crafty: (021) essentially as in ch. v. xv. 35) it is not in interrogative.” Del.]), nor as 12) i. e., thou doest as crafty offenders do, who, the subject (Ewald: “to reprove with words pro- when accused, hypocritically set themselves forth fiteth not,' etc.—as if this useless striving with as innocent, and indeed even take the offensive words were opposed to a more efficient conten- against their accusers, (as Job did in ch. xii. tion by the use of facts) (which yields indeed, as 4 seq.). [" The perverse heart teaches the guilty Dillmann remarks, a good meaning, to wit, that
man presumptuously to assail God, and at the mere words availed nothing for self-justification, same time so to arrange his words that in apwhen opposed by facts, as e. g. the fact of his pearance he is filled with the greatest zeal for suffering, which was presumptive evidence line piety which he really undermines.” Schlott.] against him.
But such a contrast is not ex- The rendering of Rosenm., Hirzel [Noyes, Copressed. The 78 of ver. 4 does not at all ex- nant, Carey), etc.” “ while thou (although press it). Rather is it joined to the preceding thou) choosest, etc.”' is less satisfactory, and finite verbs in the sense of an ablative gerund goes with the rendering of the first member, (redarguendo s. disputando); comp. Ewald, & which is controverted above. 280, a.
Ver. 6. Thy mouth condemns thee (see Ver. 4. Yea more, thou [thyself] dost ch. ix. 20) and not I, and thy lips testify make void the fear of God. 78, a strong against thee.--The mouth is here personified copula, adding a new and more serious charge, as a judge pronouncing an unfavorable decision, like the phrase “over and above ;" comp. ch. declaring one guilty, wbile at the same time the xiv. 3. [onx, emphatic—“even thou, who lips figure as witnesses, or accusers (? nej, a voz dost fancy thyself to be called on to remind us forensis; for the masc. 73. after the fem. of the fear of God, ch. xiii. 9 seq.] 78?, abso- | 7??? comp. Prov. v. 2; xxvi. 23). Comp. still lute, as in ch. iv. 6; 19., “to remove, make further the New Testament parallel passage, void,” as in ch. v. 12 [lit. to break, destroy : Matth. xii. 37. [“ These words, according to Rodwell: “thou dost break down piety”].
Eliphaz's meaning, place Job's guilt not merely And diminishest (devout) meditation be in his words, but rather set forth these as con
firming the sinful actions, which he is assumed fore God -48-25 any, according to Ps. to have committed on account of the sufferings cii. 1; cxix. 97, 99, the same with “ devotion, which have been appointed for him.” Schlott]. pious prayerful reflection” [should not there. Second Strophe : Vers. 7–11. [Ironical quesfore be rendered “ prayer," although prayer is tioning in regard to the extraordinary superia prominent element in it. It includes the whole ority which Job's conduct implied that he arro. meditative side of piety, that over which a sanc- gated to himself). tified sentiment rules, as 787' includes the pric Ver. 7. Wast thou born as the first man ? tical side, over which conscience rules. Eliphaz charges therefore that the tendency of Jol's (10x? ["pin??? is the original form, wbich apspeech and conduct is to undermine piety in its pears again in Josh. xxi. 10, and is retained by most important strongholds, to injure it in its Ithe Samaritans; pies?, instead of which we
have in ch. viii. 8 picion, which has passed into | lxxxix. 8 . [“ Here God is represented in Ori. general use, and is hence chosen by the K’ri.” ental language as seated in a divan, or council
and El. asks of Job whether he had Dillm.) in the constr. st followed by the collec- of state, .. tive Ohx; hence lit. "as first of men.-Delitzsch been admitted to that council.” Barnes.]-And takes Dix as predicate nominative: “wast thou dost thou keep back wisdom to thyself? as the first one born as a man?” A rendering
77??without the article, denoting the absolute which is altogether too artificial. The question divine wisdom; comp. ch. xi. 6; xii. 2; Prov. presupposes that the first-created man, by virtue viii. 1 seq. In regard to ynd, see above on ver. of his having proceeded immediately from God's
4. [Gesenius: “ Dost thou reserve all wisdom band, possessed the deepest insight into the mys
to thyself ?”' like the Arabic, to absorb, drink teries of the Divine process of creation. Comp. up.
Fürst : "to snatch away: hast thou purthe Adam Kadmon of the Kabbalists, the Kajo- loined wisdom to thyself? ¿. e. captured it as a morts of the Avesta (apūroç åvo putos of the booty." The representation of the First Man, Manicheang), the Manu (i.e., "the ihinking endowed with the highest wisdom, a witness of one”) of the Bruhmanic legends of creation as
God's activity in creating and ordering the well as the ironical proverb of the Hindûs: world, still lies at the bottom of these questions. “ Aye, aye, he is the first man, no wonder he is Comp. God's questions at a later period to Job: so wise!” (Roberts, Oriental Illustrations, p.
ch. xxxviii. 3 seq.
["Having obtained the 276). [“. Eliphaz evidently gives in the
secret of that council, art thou now keeping it verses the conception of a First Man, (like the wholly to thyself—as a prime minister might be Manu of the Hindus), possessed as such of the supposed to keep the purposes resolved on in highest wisdom, a being who before the founda- the divan?” Barnes ] tions of the earth were laid, was present, a list
On ver. 9 comp. ch. xii. 3; xiii. 2, to which ener, as it were, to the deliberations concerning self-conscious utterances of Job Eliphaz here creation in the council of God, and thus a par
replies. taker at least of creative wisdom (ch. xxviii. 23
Ver. 10. Both the gray-headed and the seq), without being identified with the Divine aged [hoary] are among us;
“ also MON.” Dillm. “Many erroneously understand among us are the gray-headed, are the aged;" this expression as signifying simply the grentest for the DA is inverted, as in ch. ii. 10, and as in antiquity, so that the sense would be: dost thru the parallel passages there cited. 13.3 is equivacombine in thyself the wisdom of all the centu- lent to: “in our generation, in our race.” We ries, from the creation of the world on? This
are to think, on the one side, of Job's appeal to conception would be unsuitable for the reason
the aged men, to whom he owed his wisdom, ch. that it would have no reality corresponding to xii, 12; on the other side, of the proverbial it, the first man being conceived of as dead long wisdom of the “sons of the East,” to whom the since.” Schlott.] -And wast thou brought three friends as well as Job belonged (1 Kings forth before the hills ? _Shin, passive of iv. 30), especially that of the Temanites ; see
above on ch. ii. 11. The supposition of Ewald, “to whirl” (hence to writhe, be in pain, Hirzel, Dillmann, etc., that Eliphaz, “in modestly travail], Ps. xc. 2.—Precisely the same expres- concealed language, ” referred to himself, as the sion occurs in Prov, viii. 25 b, an utterance of most aged of the three, has but little probability, God's Eternal Wisdom, which is doubtless an in- for the statement: "there is also among us tentional allusion to this passage. [So also De- (three) a gray-headed, an aged man,” would in litzsch.-Schlottmann, on the contrary, thinks the mouth of El. himself have in it something it indisputable that this passage contains an al- exceedingly forced, if he had thereby meant lusion, if not to the passage in Proverbs, then himself; and the collective use of the sing. Si the sense would be: * art thou the essential Di- and typogy presents not the slightest grammatical vine Wisdom itself, through which God created difficulty. Still further, if El. had (according the world ?” The verse thus furnishes a preg- to b) declared himself “more abundant in days nant and energetic progression of thought and than Job's father,” he would have said of himexpression. "Being born before the hills," and self that which would have been simply mon“sitting in God's council,” could not be taken as strous. The correct explanation is given among accidentia sine subjecto, which without baving a
the moderns by Rosenm., Arnheim, Umbreit, real substratum, are sarcastically predicated of Delitzsch. [“. It will be seen (infra xviii. 3) that Job, but they must be regarded as inhering in a
in the discussion carried on between Job and definite subject, with which Job is now com- his friends, he is not always regarded as a sinpared, as immediately before he was compared gle individual, but rather as the representative with the first man; and this makes it necessary
of the party whose views he holds, that of the that we should think of the ante-mundane Wig- philosophers, namely, who wish to understand dom described in Prov. viii., which from an early and account for everything; while his friends, period was brought into special relation to the as the contrary, represent the orthodox party, first man. Ewald accordingly paraphrases vers.
whose principle it is to declare everything that 7, 8: “Thou, who wouldest be wiser than all comes from God good and right, whether it be other men, dost thou stand perchance at the head comprehensible or incomprehensible to the of humanity, like the Logos, the first alike in age, human intellect. Hence the plural ?'ya, in and in worth and Dearness to God ?'']
your eyes, used by Bildad (though speaking to Ver. 8. Didst thou listen in the council Job alone), in the chapter alluded to, i. e. in the of Eloah ?-Tid, as in Jer. xxiii. 18; comp. Ps. eyes of you philosophers. In like manner, in
the verse before us El. says: Both gray-headed | iv. 18, and hence used of the angels (see on ch. and very aged men are amongst us. Amongst v. 1).-And the heavens are not pure in us orthodox people.” Bernard.] Ver. 11. Are the consolations of God xlix. 13 (comp. Luke xv. 18, 21; Matt. xxi. 25),
His eyes. D'p is neither here, nor in Is. (comp. ch. xxi. 2) too little for thee (lit. are they less than thee-comp. Num. xvi. 9; Is. vii. to be taken as a synonym of d'oxho, or of 13)? [The irony of the question is severe: Too anho 4238 (Targ.), as many commentators little for thee are the consolations of God? The words reveal at the same time the narrow self- explain from the Targumists down to Hirzel, complacency of the speaker, the consolations of Heiligst., Welte [Schlott., Carey, Ren.], etc. God being such as he and the friends bad sought Rather, as the parallel passage in ch. xxv. 5 to administer, for which El., however, claims a incontestably shows, it designates the starty heaDivine value and efficacy.-E.], and a word vens, which are bere contemplated in respect of so gentle with thee? i. e. a word which, their pure brilliancy, and their physical elevalike my former discourse, dealt with thee so
tion above the impure earthly sphere. So cortenderly and gently. On ors, elsewhere ogs, rectly, Umbreit, Delitzsch, Dillmann. [“In
comparison with the all-transcending holiness lit. "for softness," i. e. softly, gently [l. g. Is. and purity of God, the creatures which ethically viii. 6 of the soft murmur and gentle fow of and physically are the purest, are impure. How Siloah), comp. Ew. & 217, d; & 243, c. Eliphaz in the representations of antiquity ethical and here identifies his former address to Job with a physical purity and impurity are throughout consolation and admonition proceeding from used interchangeably is well enough known.” God himself; as in fact in delivering the same Dillmann.] The angels are indeed regarded as (see ch. iv. 12 seq.), he ascribed the principal inhabiting the heavenly spheres, as is indispucontents of it to a Divine communication. In tably proved by the phrase O'Don7 x3Y (1 Kings regard to the gentleness which he here claims xxii. 19; Is. xxiv. 21; Ps. cxlviii. 2; comp. for that former discourse, comp. especially ch. Gen. ii. 1), and the fact that the Holy Scriptures iv. 2; v. 8, 17 seq.
everywhere speak of angels and the starry heaThird Strophe: vers. 12-16. [Severe rebuke vens together. Comp. Del. on this passage and of Job's presumptuous discontent, founded on on Gen. ii. 1; Hengstenberg; Ewald, K.-Ztg., man's extreme sinfulness. ]
1869; Preface, No. 3, 4; Zöckler: Die UrgeVer. 12. Why does thy heart carry thee schichte der Erde und des Menschen (1868), p.
12 away? np, auferre, abripere. [=here for seq.; also below, on ch. xxxviii, 7.
Ver. 16. Much less then ('? 9X, quanto deep inward agitation, excitement of feeling (Delitzsch: "wounded pride"). Why dost thou minus, like 7% above in ch. iv. 19) the abomi. allow the stormy discontent of thy bosom to transport thee beyond thyself ?-E.)–And nable and corrupt (n%8), lit. soured, one why twinkle thine eyes? Din, arr. hey = corrupted by the surin kakías, 1 Cor. v. 8, one Aram. and Arab. 197, “to wink, to blink,''
thoroughly corrupted,' Del.), the man who said here of the angry, excited snapping, or
drinks iniquity like water, i. e. who is as rolling of the eyes [referring, according to Re eager to do iniquity, shows as much avidity for dan, to such a manifestation of angry impa- sin, as a thirsty man pants for water; comp. tience with the hypocrisy of El. at this point of the repetition of this same figure by Elihu, also his discourse; and similarly Noyes: “why this Ps. lxxiii. 10; Prov. xxvi. 6; Sir. xxiv. 21. winking of thine eyes?"]. Comp. Cant. vi. 5 The whole description relates to the moral cor(according to tbe correct interpretation, see my ruption of mankind generally, of which Eliphaz remarks on the passage).
intentionally holds up before Job Ver. 13. Depending on the preceding verse : hideous picture” (according to Oetinger) than That thou turnest against God thy snort- the latter bimself had given in ch. xiv. 4, ing. myn here meaning angry breathing, Ovuós because he has in view the inipurity, ill-desert, ["thus expressed because it manifests itself in still further what he says ch. v. 7 on the spark
and need of repentance of Job himself. Comp. véelv (Acts ix. 1), and has its rise in the avevia like proneness of man to sin and its penalty. (Eccl. vii. 9).” Delitzsch], as in Judg. viii. 3; Prov. xvi. 32; Is. XXV. 4; comp. above Job iv.
Fourth Strophe : vers. 17-19. Transition to 9.–And sendest forth words out of thy of a captatio benevolentiæ.
the didactic discourse which follows in the form mouth ? 19 (comp. ch. iv. 2) as parallel Ver. 17. I will inform thee (comp. ch. xiii. with nin can mean here only vehement, intem-17), listen to me, and that which I have perate speaking, passionate words, not empty vi. 15, or like 1977 above in ch. xiii. 16, and
seen will I relate.—7! is neuter, as in Gen. speaking, as Kamphn. explains it.
Ver. 14 repeats the principal proposition of 77777?! is a relative clause; comp. Ges. & 122 Eliphaz in his former discourse (ch. iv. 17-20), [& 120], 2-nin needs Dot (with Schlottm.) be with an accompanying reminder of Job's con- understood in the sense of an ecstatic vision, of the fession in ch. xiv. which was in substantial prophetic sort, seeing that in ch. viii. 17; xxiii. 9; harmony therewith. On nex 735? comp ch. xxiv. 1; xxvii
: 12, etc., it denotes also the knowxiv. 1.
ledge or experience of sensible things. MoreVer. 15. Behold, in His holy ones He
over, as ver. 18 shows, Eliphaz makes a very de
finite distinction between that which is now to pats no trust. D'07; the same as D'73), ch. be communicated and a Divine revelation of